Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
I'm talking about deliberately restricting their speculations in only one direction, the other direction, being off limits.
244 posted on 10/31/2003 9:49:59 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: MissAmericanPie
"I'm talking about deliberately restricting their speculations in only one direction, the other direction, being off limits."

But those aren't "scientists", they are simply the newest category in "the oldest profession".

245 posted on 10/31/2003 9:59:21 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

To: MissAmericanPie
Scientist seldom speculate in the direction of supernatural causes because the fundamental hypothesis of science is that the laws of nature are constant over time. The search for explanations in science is the search for rules that are consistent over time.

Asking a scientist to assume, as a starting point, that an event is the result of a miracle, is simply not going to happen. It isn't the way science works; it isn't what science does.

This doesn't mean that there aren't miracles, and it doesn't mean that all scientists disbelieve in miracles. It simply means that the definition of science is the search for naturalistic explanations.
248 posted on 10/31/2003 11:05:28 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson