Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Will Congress Stop Pandering To Greens And Begin To Protect Our Forests And People?
toogoodreports.com ^ | October 29, 2003 | Alan Caruba

Posted on 10/28/2003 5:13:40 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

On September 22 of this year, Jack Blackwell, a regional forester of the Pacific Southwest Region of the US Forest Service, testified before the Committee on Resources of the House subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health. Barely a month later, his warnings about the conditions of the forested areas of southern California came true, destroying countless homes and taking lives in its path.

He began by noting that the 672,000 acres of the San Bernadino National Forest had some 24 million people living within a two-hour drive and that it was going through "a significant cycle of drought-related, vegetation mortality" involving "severe tree loss." The result was "a tremendous build-up of hazardous fuels" for a cataclysmic fire.

He noted, "Some community covenants have restricted landowners since the 1920s from tree removal activities on private land within the National Forest" and that the "Forest has not had an active timber harvest program for nearly ten years. There are no lumber mills in southern California and now the current removal of dead and dying trees is difficult and expensive."

How much more expensive will be the replacement of the homes that have since been destroyed? Or the loss of revenue due to the restrictions on properly managing this forest areas that could have been gained by cutting and thinning its overgrown mass of trees? Since the Greens mounted their Spotted Owl hoax in the northwest more than a decade ago, countless sawmills have gone out of business and many small towns dependent on them have withered to a few families.

Blackwell told the committee "The President´s Healthy Forest Initiative would play a key role in helping us avoid situations such as we see on the San Bernadino National Forest today. The initiative is based on a common-sense approach to reducing the threat of catastrophic wildfires by restoring forest and rangeland health and ensuring the long-term safety and health of communities and natural resources in our care."

He urged "a public and private partnership" as "critical in providing an integrated and coordinated approach to address the crisis forest-wide." And he told the committee that the Forest Service had "redirected $3.2 million in State Fire Assistance and Community Protection/Community Assistance funding for wildfire prevention and hazardous fuels reduction…"

Blackwell warned that other forested areas have similar conditions. "Those ecological conditions, combined with the massive influx of people into California´s wildlands and the rapid growth of communities in and around those wildlands, particularly in the Sierra Nevada, have created the potential for truly disastrous wildfires."

One can hardly wonder what Blackwell is thinking these days or the many forest managers and others who, for years now, have been warning against the now annual loss of huge forest areas to these fires. The plain fact is that the US Forest Service has known for decades that these problems exist and has been issuing these warnings, but the success of the environmental movement in deterring the proper management of forests has once again reaped the whirlwind.

There literally is no excuse for the loss of life and property we have witnessed on our television news and read about in our daily newspapers. The President has been under attack the Greens for his proposed solution to this problem and this is just one more example of the irresponsible and dangerous efforts of Greens to attack the timber industry in every way possible.

It is, of course, all part of the Green attack on the economy in general. It has succeeded, not only with the huge loss of forested areas, the homes of those in and adjacent to them, but also in driving up the cost of lumber in an economy in which new home sales plays a significant, if not the leading role.

There are 490 million acres called timberlands in the US. They can produce more than 20 cubic feet of wood per acre annually. They´re growing more trees today than they were fifty years ago. At the same time, 247 million acres (33.5%) are reserved from harvest by law or are slow-growing woodlands unsuitable for timber production. The bottom line is that the US has some 70% of the forestland that was here in 1600, fully 737 million acres, when the pilgrims first arrived.

The US National Park System represents 83 million acres and unlike national forests, national parks do not allow any timber harvesting. The National Forest System, some 191 million acres, was established "…to furnish a continuous supply of timber for the use and necessities of citizens of the United States." These National Forests contribute 25% of the gross receipts from timber sales directly to states for county roads and schools, amounting to millions of dollars each year. All that revenue has been lost because of these preventable catastrophic fires.

This situation has long been known to Congress and to Americans who have witnessed the annual losses. Civil servants like Jack Blackwell have been telling Congress what the problem is and how to solve it. The real question is when will Congress stop pandering to vocal Green organizations and their lobbying, and begin to protect our forests and our people? And when will Americans stop buying into all their lies?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: environment; healthyforests

1 posted on 10/28/2003 5:13:40 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Well it is PAST DUE already. Watched the fires from our back door last year when we lived in Claremont, Ca., just east of LA.
2 posted on 10/28/2003 5:15:10 PM PST by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary, Hairy Hildabeast, Mistress of ALL Darkness? Me Neither!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The federal government owns too much of the land in most western states.
3 posted on 10/28/2003 5:18:57 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
That may be true, but a good part of this is a result of people moving into areas that are prone to burn, and would be prone to burn regardless of what actions were taken by the government. I feel for them, but if they choose to live in a hazardous area, they have to accept the risks that come with it.
4 posted on 10/28/2003 5:22:14 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We own some timberland in Santa Cruz, and accomplished a sizeable thinning harvest five years ago. But oh, the hoops we had to jump through. The lumber yard owner told me it was the best timber he'd ever seen; slow growth, dense and straight-grain. And we're allowed to do it every ten years. It's just the nutcases out there that make it difficult.

My prediction is that the Tahoe Basin will be next. It's really a mess. About every fourth tree is dead; it's a tinderbox.
5 posted on 10/28/2003 5:27:52 PM PST by EggsAckley (..........................God Bless and Keep Terri.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It's not so much a Congress that panders to the Greens but a public that cannot make a distinction between science and emotion. If voters would vote with thier brains rather that their emotions, we wouldn't have members of Congress who allow Greens to have so much influence in our national politics.
6 posted on 10/28/2003 5:29:11 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
7 posted on 10/28/2003 5:31:06 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I've never understood this kowtowing to these extremists. How many votes could they POSSIBLY represent??
8 posted on 10/28/2003 5:43:15 PM PST by ChocChipCookie (Beware: the Chip is pissed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room

9 posted on 10/28/2003 5:50:04 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This is kind of off topic but I have been wondering why the California newspapers and Law Enforcement Agencies are saying almost nothing about the arsonists who started these fires.

If the government thought they we islamic terrorists, we would have State and Federal Law enforcement all over the place. Therefore, I suspect that they are probably either ecoterrorists or just plain arsonists. Why are they not responding to this threat from possible radical environmentalist terrorists?
10 posted on 10/28/2003 5:56:52 PM PST by CHUCKfromCAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
If it's any comfort, this fact that this fire is destroying so many homes may be the catalyst for real change. Yes, the price is high. It's been very high every year since 1998.

While we can't blame Clinton for environazi policies which have grown increasingly totalitarian for the past 30 years, we CAN blame him for axing so much FFD funding - including firefighting funds - and misappropriating billions in Forestry Dept funds in order to scarf up land to add to his legacy. In CA we can blame Gray, an Algore, Earth Manefesto mini-me with Clinton's killer instincts, as well as the envirowackos who've taken over the state bureauacracy.

11 posted on 10/28/2003 6:39:35 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHUCKfromCAL
Were they really arsonists? Or was it lightning, or careless campers, or even environmentalists bent on revenge? Who really knows? What is the evidence?
12 posted on 10/28/2003 8:22:48 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
shouldn't the title of your post really be "when will people stop burning down our forrests?"

PEOPLE are behind this, and they should be punished.
13 posted on 10/28/2003 9:47:36 PM PST by lpricanprynces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
14 posted on 10/29/2003 3:17:15 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The burning of our national forests is the perfect example of socialism where everyone owns the resource and land and no one owns the resource and land. It gets used, abused and finally used up.

You don't see these conflagrations on private land. Land in private hands is cared for because the owner has various incentives to do so.

If people in the cities don't understand this, they need to look at private housing vs public housing.

Homes in private hands have more value than public housing. It's because private owners have incentive to care for their property while people in public housing have no incentive to care for it.

This lesson - the fires - will need to be repeated again and again until soccor moms finally close their wallets to the greedy fascists at the Sierra Club.
15 posted on 10/29/2003 5:40:52 AM PST by sergeantdave (You will be judged by 12 people who were too stupid to get out of jury duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson