Skip to comments.
Town saw wife change when husband vanished
AP ^
| October 26, 2003
| Mike Wilson
Posted on 10/28/2003 12:44:54 AM PST by witnesstothefall
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: Savage Beast
William Faulkner bump.
To: dirtboy
How is a response to a self-defense situation a "violence on women" fantasy?
Because the discussion on the thread, and the statement I made, was about physical abuse against women by men. But all of a sudden, it became the opposite, a discussion about women doing/threatening lethal violence against men, so as to justify or rationalize violence against women. That's why.
In short, your point was not germane. It's an amazing thing, whenever the subject of physical abuse of women comes up, a man appears who feels it's his mission to point out the extreme situations when violence against becomes heroic.
To: witnesstothefall
Leave it to the AP to take this one quote:
"She was free - like a weight had been lifted off her shoulders," said Mary Schmitz.
..And come up with THIS headline:
Town saw wife change when husband vanished
43
posted on
10/28/2003 1:58:46 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(DEPORT HILLARY!)
To: witnesstothefall
You laid down the gauntlet by making an absolute statement:
Any man who strikes a woman is not a man. Period.
So then don't complain when the thread takes a turn down that road.
44
posted on
10/28/2003 1:58:47 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Now in theaters - Howard Dean as Buzz Lightweight - taking the Dems to Oblivion and Beyond in 2004!)
To: dirtboy
I'm not the one complaining am I? I stated my opinion that a man who strikes a woman is not a man.
Our grandfathers would not have a problem with that statement, and that's clearly the spirit in which I meant it.
Many moralisms are stated in absolute terms, for the very good reason that it sends the message that the moral crime should never happen among moral people.
Morality lessons aren't very instructional if not expressed in absolute terms, are they?
But I understand your point. You were just making an argument, not imparting an idea.
To: witnesstothefall
Miz MacKinnon is one of the premier, Grade A feminist extremists. I'll spare you the details, since you don't want to know.
Misogyny and misandry were invented sometime shortly after Adam and Eve bit the big one, probably as a direct result of their culinary errors. Currently, misandry is quite popular amongst the distaff "knuckle draggers". Check out the offerings in a greeting-card store. Or the Lifetime Movie Network. It ain't purty, and it's getting worse. But it will also pass; societal stupidity is always changing.
I consider physical violence and verbal cruelty unacceptable methods of settling interpersonal disputes for either sex. I don't think that's a particularly "modern" idea.
To: Lizavetta
Right. Next they'll announce that they've found Caddie Compson somewhere.
47
posted on
10/28/2003 2:10:49 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
("'Liberalism' is a quagmire." ~Floyd Geron Looney~)
To: witnesstothefall
Morality lessons aren't very instructional if not expressed in absolute terms, are they? Absolutism is the refuge of small minds. For example, the Ten Commandments say "Thou shall not kill" - but there are many situations where killing is justified and even moral. So one needs to engage the ol' brain to sort out individual situations. Otherwise, you're no better than those "zero-tolerance" nitwits who suspend a kid for bringing nail clippers to school.
48
posted on
10/28/2003 2:11:48 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(Now in theaters - Howard Dean as Buzz Lightweight - taking the Dems to Oblivion and Beyond in 2004!)
To: witnesstothefall
OBTW, do you think it's OK for a woman to beat on her husband?
To: dirtboy
I'll tell you what, you spend your time coming up with corollaries to the 10 Commandments (that God, He sure is small-minded isn't he!?), and I'll spend my time trying to stick to the straight and narrow.
Go in Peace.
To: ArrogantBustard
You're being silly because I hurt your feelings I suspect. I think you and I actually agree, that violence is a horrible method to communicate.
I'm guilty of thinking that man-on-woman violence is slightly more contemptible than its inverse. So sue me.
To: witnesstothefall
You sure hurt my feelings, all right... I apparently don't even rate a real, creative, intelligent flame from you.
Boo hoo. Sniff. ROFL.
man-on-woman violence is slightly more contemptible than its inverse
I used to think that, too. I've seen really vile misandric behaviour from women who are constantly ranting about "violence against women". The hypocricy seems to elude them. They want equality? Fine. I'll hold them in equal contempt as abusive men...
To: ArrogantBustard
Boo hoo. Sniff. ROFL
May I ask how old you are? Very curious.
To: witnesstothefall
The 3 "S"s
She got the the first and last "S-word" correct. But the middle one is not Spare bedroom.
54
posted on
10/28/2003 2:46:12 PM PST
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: witnesstothefall
Many years older than the age you claim on your profile page.
Make of it what you will.
To: All
56
posted on
10/28/2003 7:22:58 PM PST
by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
To: witnesstothefall
I'll tell you what, you spend your time coming up with corollaries to the 10 Commandments (that God, He sure is small-minded isn't he!?), and I'll spend my time trying to stick to the straight and narrow. So, then, do you believe that it is always wrong to kill?
57
posted on
10/29/2003 6:15:37 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Now in theaters - Howard Dean as Buzz Lightweight - taking the Dems to Oblivion and Beyond in 2004!)
To: dirtboy
For example, the Ten Commandments say "Thou shall not kill" - but there are many situations where killing is justified and even moral. So one needs to engage the ol' brain to sort out individual situations. Otherwise, you're no better than those "zero-tolerance" nitwits who suspend a kid for bringing nail clippers to school.I'm on the same side as you about "zero tolerance" in the schools.
But the Sixth Commandment is more accurately translated "Thou shalt not murder."
To: witnesstothefall
The D.A. should let this case die on the vine. It's unwinnable.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson