Is there ANY evil that they won't blame on Bush?

The Star ^ | Sunday 26 October | Michael Bowers

[xrp]

Almost everyday I read or hear from Democrats (aka 'People of Lesser Intelligence') say, "this is all Bush's fault". It is absolutely mind boggling...

[SamAdams76]

It's Bush's fault that I came to this thread. If only I hated Bush, then I wouldn't even be here (on Free Republic) to see this thread. So that proves everything right there. It's all Bush's fault.

[Argh]

They used to blame Reagan for everything, too.

[Naspino]

Is there any evil they won't blame Bush for? Sure. Abortion and Hillary's Legs.

[Miss Marple]

This needs to be repeated, because it describes the situation in a nutchell:

Today's Bush-haters: Never before have I seen a group of such mean, nasty bullies pretend to be the victim of such meanness, nastiness and bullying.

[Smokin' Joe]

Some of his friends, Chait said, describe Bush's very existence as a "constant oppressive force in their daily psyche."

Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

[alrea]

According to Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Georgia Republican who attended the closed briefing, Kay said he had found no actual weapons of mass destruction. But this was only a small part of the report. Kay also outlined what had been a vigorous, extensive and frightening effort by Saddam to gain such weapons.

For instance, said the senator, "Kay found a prison laboratory complex that might have been used to test biowarfare agents on humans, unmanned aerial vehicle and missile technology banned by the United Nations, and equipment for uranium enrichment that could have helped restart Iraq's nuclear weapons program once sanctions were lifted."

It is time for Americans to realize that the Democratic Party and the NY Times are part of a terrorist network that seeks to destroy anything opposing the party.

[New Horizon]

Is there ANY evil that they won't blame on Bush?

I'll take a shot at this one.

No.

[randog]

I have a real strong feeling that this hate Bush "platform" the dems have adopted is going to backfire in '04...bigtime. Not only will Bush win by a landslide, but he'll bring in a lot of conservatives on his coat tails. You think this pulling-of-hair and gnashing-of-teeth is bad now, just wait.

[Grampa Dave]

Great article and thanks for posting it.

I have bookmarked it.

I will use it like a baseball bat on the phoney/pretend to be conservatives who post liberal Hate/Blame GW articles on FR to blame GW for what didn't happen.

[M Kehoe]

"Some of his friends, Chait said, describe Bush's very existence as a "constant oppressive force in their daily psyche.""

Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

Me too, but with good reason. You knew that every day there was going to be another lie, scandal , etc.

5.56mm

[Eric in the Ozarks]

And I don't think all of them (Clinton scandals) have come to light yet...

[backhoe]

They used to blame Reagan for everything, too.

Yes, and to a somewhat lesser extent, Richard Nixon, too. I well recall the hatred & vitriol that came Mr. Nixon's way.

[Libloather]

Is there any evil that they don't blame on Bush?

The birth of Hillary...

[IoCaster]

Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

Hehehe...I still do. I can't stomach to watch the sleazy scumbag anytime they splash his repellent mug on TV.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

bump for later

[Smokin' Joe]

I still feel that way, but it is most acute when Hillary is on TV, being sucked up to as if she were the greatest thing since toilet paper.

That carpetbaggeress can still run for POTUS. Not Vice-POTUS, 'cause the lead ticket holder will be Ron-Browned, Vince Fostered, or simply capped in a grandstand event devised to make it a breeze to disarm the rest of us. She has the will.

[mewzilla]

Halitosis? Or maybe they have and I missed it. Probably :)

[Capt. Tom]

I sent you the folowing e- mail which might be of interest to fellow Freepers because it brings up another angle they hit Bush with. (Bush probaly should be hit , but the way it is presented in the press he is totally to blame.)

Hi Michael.
I enjoyed your column of Sun. Oct 26 th on blaming everything on Bush.

Another thing that bothers me is all the outsourcing of jobs and the resulting unemployment of Americans seems to have had it start in 2000.
"Since 2000 X number of jobs have been lost."seems to be he theme of newspaper articles.

I can recall when Bush, Clinton and Perot were running for president long before 2000, that Perot was talking about the "Giant Sucking Sound" and our jobs going to Mexico.

It would appear there are no job loss statistics from outsourcing the jobs before 2000 that are available to the lamestream press.</sarcasm off

Keep up the good work. - Tom.