Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there ANY evil that they won't blame on Bush?
The Star ^ | Sunday 26 October | Michael Bowers

Posted on 10/26/2003 6:12:28 AM PST by mjbowers

Is there any evil that they don't blame on Bush?

Sunday, October 26, 2003

By Michael J. Bowers

Star columnist

---------

The hate just never stops.

Now it's George Bush's fault that the prime minister of Malaysia is an anti-Semitic bigot.

This is what Paul Krugman, the leader of the Republican-haters on the New York Times opinion page, believes.

In case you missed it, a couple of weeks ago, the prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, told an Islamic summit meeting: "The Europeans killed 6 million Jews out of 12 million. But today, the Jews rule this world by proxy: They get others to fight and die for them."

To make it worse, Mohamad got a standing ovation from 57 Muslim leaders.

This hate was astonishing enough. I didn't think it could be topped. But I underestimated the ability of Paul Krugman. He topped it.

Krugman says you really can't blame Mahathir; Bush made him do it!

Here's how Krugman explained it on Tuesday morning:

"Mr. Mahathir thinks that to cover his domestic flank, he must insert hateful words into a speech mainly about Muslim reform. That tells you, more accurately than any poll, just how strong the rising tide of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism among Muslims in Southeast Asia has become.

"Thanks to its war in Iraq and its unconditional support for Ariel Sharon, Washington has squandered post-9-11 sympathy and brought relations with the Muslim world to a new low."

Is there anything at all in the world that the Bush-haters will not blame on the president?

Krugman is one of many such haters on the Left. Eight years ago, Nina Totenberg, a reporter for NPR, as much as wished doom upon Sen. Jesse Helms.

"If there is retributive justice," she said during a heated radio discussion, "he'll get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of his grandchildren will get it."

Now Totenberg is back with a similar sentiment for Army Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin. The general's sin? He described the war on terrorism as akin to a war on Satan.

Now I believe some of the things Boykin said were a little nutty. But I also believe it was hard not to see something Satanic in the images of the condemned workers peering out the windows of the World Trade Center on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.

But seeing evil in wanton murder is too rigid and fundamentalist for good people like Totenberg. She said of the general: "I hope he's not long for this world."

When people who heard her were taken aback, she backpedaled. "In his job, in his job, in his job, please, please, in his job!" she said.

Thanks, Nina. That makes it all better.

Earlier this summer, I wrote about the Left's hatred for all things Bush, and so I have hesitated to bring it up again lest I be guilty of repetitiveness.

But this week, I can't rein myself. The hate just gets more and more offensive.

For example, in September, Jonathan Chait, a writer for The New Republic, wrote a remarkable piece explaining why he hates President Bush. Some of his friends, Chait said, describe Bush's very existence as a "constant oppressive force in their daily psyche." Chait can't even stand the way Bush talks or walks.

Is this hatred normal? Or are we approaching the edge of insanity here?

Not only do the Bush-haters hate, they also lie.

For instance, a couple of months ago, President Bush stated there was no evidence of a close link between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida. The press bit into his leg like a pit bull and hasn't let go yet. They keep saying gleefully that Bush "admitted" no link.

But this loaded word makes it a lie, because Bush never said there was a link. We didn't knock out Saddam because the dictator plotted 9-11; we knocked him out because we want to create a stable, democratic Middle East that won't birth more fanaticism and terror.

Another thing the haters complain about is that Bush sold the war as a response to an "imminent" threat. He lied, they cry — Iraq was never an imminent threat.

Again, those who accuse Bush of lying are lying themselves. Bush never said the threat was imminent. In fact, in his State of the Union address, he said just the opposite:

"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations would come too late."

And then there's the report by weapons inspector David Kay to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

According to Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Georgia Republican who attended the closed briefing, Kay said he had found no actual weapons of mass destruction. But this was only a small part of the report. Kay also outlined what had been a vigorous, extensive and frightening effort by Saddam to gain such weapons.

For instance, said the senator, "Kay found a prison laboratory complex that might have been used to test biowarfare agents on humans, unmanned aerial vehicle and missile technology banned by the United Nations, and equipment for uranium enrichment that could have helped restart Iraq's nuclear weapons program once sanctions were lifted."

Chambliss was shocked when he woke up the next day to headlines such as: "No evidence of Iraq WMD programs found."

Pathetically, the Bush-haters can dish it out, but they can't take it. Whenever a conservative says something even remotely skeptical of the motives of the Left, they go into a rage about Republican "mean-spiritedness."

It boggles the mind. Do these people ever read their own newspapers? And have they never heard the awful things said by the likes of Bill Moyers, Bob Herbert and Michael Moore?

Did they miss the recent "Boondocks" strip in which the cartoonist had our wonderful and brilliant national security adviser, Condi Rice, destroying the planet because she can't get a boyfriend?

Today's Bush-haters: Never before have I seen a group of such mean, nasty bullies pretend to be the victim of such meanness, nastiness and bullying.

Michael Bowers is a copy editor for The Star. He can be reached via e-mail at mbowers@starnewspapers.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blamegwgame; blamingbush; blaminggw; bushhaters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2003 6:12:28 AM PST by mjbowers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Almost everyday I read or hear from Democrats (aka 'People of Lesser Intelligence') say, "this is all Bush's fault". It is absolutely mind boggling...
2 posted on 10/26/2003 6:13:52 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
It's Bush's fault that I came to this thread. If only I hated Bush, then I wouldn't even be here (on Free Republic) to see this thread. So that proves everything right there. It's all Bush's fault.

3 posted on 10/26/2003 6:15:28 AM PST by SamAdams76 (202.4 (-97.6) Homestretch to 200)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
They used to blame Reagan for everything, too.
4 posted on 10/26/2003 6:17:04 AM PST by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Is there any evil they won't blame Bush for? Sure. Abortion and Hillary's Legs.
5 posted on 10/26/2003 6:19:02 AM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
This needs to be repeated, because it describes the situation in a nutchell:

Today's Bush-haters: Never before have I seen a group of such mean, nasty bullies pretend to be the victim of such meanness, nastiness and bullying.

6 posted on 10/26/2003 6:20:59 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Some of his friends, Chait said, describe Bush's very existence as a "constant oppressive force in their daily psyche."

Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

7 posted on 10/26/2003 6:21:26 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
According to Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Georgia Republican who attended the closed briefing, Kay said he had found no actual weapons of mass destruction. But this was only a small part of the report. Kay also outlined what had been a vigorous, extensive and frightening effort by Saddam to gain such weapons.

For instance, said the senator, "Kay found a prison laboratory complex that might have been used to test biowarfare agents on humans, unmanned aerial vehicle and missile technology banned by the United Nations, and equipment for uranium enrichment that could have helped restart Iraq's nuclear weapons program once sanctions were lifted."

It is time for Americans to realize that the Democratic Party and the NY Times are part of a terrorist network that seeks to destroy anything opposing the party.

8 posted on 10/26/2003 6:22:04 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Is there ANY evil that they won't blame on Bush?

I'll take a shot at this one.

No.

9 posted on 10/26/2003 6:23:37 AM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
I have a real strong feeling that this hate Bush "platform" the dems have adopted is going to backfire in '04...bigtime. Not only will Bush win by a landslide, but he'll bring in a lot of conservatives on his coat tails. You think this pulling-of-hair and gnashing-of-teeth is bad now, just wait.
10 posted on 10/26/2003 6:24:00 AM PST by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers; Miss Marple; BOBTHENAILER; PhilDragoo; Dog; Dog Gone; hchutch
Great article and thanks for posting it.

I have bookmarked it.

I will use it like a baseball bat on the phoney/pretend to be conservatives who post liberal Hate/Blame GW articles on FR to blame GW for what didn't happen.
11 posted on 10/26/2003 6:37:03 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Get a free FR coffee mug! Donate $10 monthly to Free Republic or 34 cents/day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"Some of his friends, Chait said, describe Bush's very existence as a "constant oppressive force in their daily psyche.""

Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

Me too, but with good reason. You knew that every day there was going to be another lie, scandal , etc.

5.56mm

12 posted on 10/26/2003 6:47:51 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
And I don't think all of them (Clinton scandals) have come to light yet...
13 posted on 10/26/2003 6:52:12 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Argh
They used to blame Reagan for everything, too.

Yes, and to a somewhat lesser extent, Richard Nixon, too. I well recall the hatred & vitriol that came Mr. Nixon's way.

14 posted on 10/26/2003 6:56:04 AM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Is there any evil that they don't blame on Bush?

The birth of Hillary...

15 posted on 10/26/2003 7:01:23 AM PST by Libloather (No amount of Botox can cover up Hillary's baggage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Funny, I felt that way about Clinton.

Hehehe...I still do. I can't stomach to watch the sleazy scumbag anytime they splash his repellent mug on TV.

16 posted on 10/26/2003 7:02:06 AM PST by IoCaster ("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
bump for later
17 posted on 10/26/2003 7:16:44 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
I still feel that way, but it is most acute when Hillary is on TV, being sucked up to as if she were the greatest thing since toilet paper.

That carpetbaggeress can still run for POTUS. Not Vice-POTUS, 'cause the lead ticket holder will be Ron-Browned, Vince Fostered, or simply capped in a grandstand event devised to make it a breeze to disarm the rest of us. She has the will.

18 posted on 10/26/2003 7:28:01 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
Halitosis? Or maybe they have and I missed it. Probably :)
19 posted on 10/26/2003 7:31:15 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjbowers
I sent you the folowing e- mail which might be of interest to fellow Freepers because it brings up another angle they hit Bush with. (Bush probaly should be hit , but the way it is presented in the press he is totally to blame.)

Hi Michael.
I enjoyed your column of Sun. Oct 26 th on blaming everything on Bush.

Another thing that bothers me is all the outsourcing of jobs and the resulting unemployment of Americans seems to have had it start in 2000.
"Since 2000 X number of jobs have been lost."seems to be he theme of newspaper articles.

I can recall when Bush, Clinton and Perot were running for president long before 2000, that Perot was talking about the "Giant Sucking Sound" and our jobs going to Mexico.

It would appear there are no job loss statistics from outsourcing the jobs before 2000 that are available to the lamestream press.</sarcasm off

Keep up the good work. - Tom.

20 posted on 10/26/2003 7:40:11 AM PST by Capt. Tom (anything done in moderation shows a lack of interest -Capt. Tom circa 1948)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson