Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
Apparently the husband's attorney is and or has been a member of the board of the Hospice - this could be conflict of interest if the Hospice offered testimony as to Terri's condition - is their loyalty to that attorney or to Terri?

This conflict of interest should it be true overturn Judge Greer rulings that all sided with the "so-called" husband.

http://becki-snow.blogspot.com/

The death Felos has prescribed for Terri starts with a ban on all but the most basic physical care - the once beautiful woman rots in her "Hospice of the Florida Suncoast" bed; Terri's advocates claim her teeth are unbrushed, her nails untrimmed, her infections untreated. This was not always the case - even after her brain injury, Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, kept her groomed and pretty. Terri was even starting to speak again - words like "yes" "no" and "stop that" - but that was before Michael Schiavo hired George Felos to help his wife "die with dignity". Now, Terri's parents have been safely removed so as to avoid "false hope". All media and medical access is tightly controlled by Micheal Schiavo and Felos; in response, Terri finally physically and mentally degenerated to the level where she may be exterminated by polite society.

Terri's slow death would have ground down to a brutal, final starvation, executed at Felos' request on Jan 3, 2003. If all went according to plan, upon Terri's death, several hundred thousand dollars that were earmarked for Terri's long-term care and therapy would have finally be released to her husband Michael Schiavo, his new lover and their baby, and existing child together and his attorney George Felos, and quite possibly in turn to the Hospice itself. It is unknown if Felos would advocate quick death for hospice patients who do not have large sums of money lubricating their exit from life; evidently the Hospice has not been forthcoming with clients in regard to George Felos' true role at the Hospice.

"The Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" has kept this information largely out of the public eye, but an investigation of the Hospice's annual reports reveals a new twist in the case of Terri Schiavo: George J. Felos was the official but unseen hand of the Hospice - and he advocates death for those in his care. He is a ardent member of the Hemlock society.

Neither George Felos nor "The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast" have openly disclosed the facts of Terri Schiavo's case to Terri's many advocates - that from February 13, 1997 until at least April 26, 2001, George J. Felos was listed as a member or recent member of the Board of Directors for "The Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" on the non-profit's annual reports.

Certainly one would hope that if the true role George Felos had been revealed in court, Judge George Greer would have made a much different ruling concerning Terri Schiavo's fate. Without knowledge of this conflict of interest, the Sixth Circuit Judge would be forgiven if he seemed to believe that such a noble institution as hospice - caring compassionately for the dying - could be trusted to make an unbiased report regarding Terri Schiavo's medical condition and with her care. With the information regarding this conflict of interest, the courts will be remiss to believe any evidence that Felos or his "Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" might proffer in reference to Terri.

Considering this new evidence, it is the opinion of this writer that the courts of Florida would be complicit in Felos' duplicity should they not review this ruling.

Conversely, if Felos' chairmanship at the Hospice was indeed known to the courts during the trial, it would have been imperative that the court make this information known to the opposing council, Terri Schiavo's parents, and to the public. Suppression of information regarding the Hospice and Felos' conflict of interest would destroy the integrity of this court, considering that Judge Greer himself was declared by the court to be Terri's guardian ad litem by default. The guardian ad litem is required to act in the best interest of Terri Schiavo - not in the best interests of Mike Schiavo, the Schindlers, Attorney Felos or the Hospice. In the minds of many, no honest court could defensibly argue that Terri's best interests would be served by lawyers, individuals or entities who stand to profit from her death.

This information regarding lack of disclosure of conflict of interest by Felos and "The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast" should warrant appeal of the Court's Nov. 22 ruling, and should spur a call for further investigation into other cases of conflict of interest concerning the Hospice and Felos. The court's Nov. 22 ruling is based in part on medical information taken from Terri while she was in the care of the Hospice - information which may have been tainted by the lack of full disclosure regarding Past Chairman/Attorney George Felos.

According to The Hospice Patients Alliance Website and the Washington Post, ("Hospices Big Business, Thanks to Medicare; Exploitation of some patients is alleged" 06/14/98) this type of unethical activity is nothing new - it also may be illegal.

If "The Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" is to cast itself as an ethical entity, it should rectify and resolve this conflict of interest regarding it's Board of Directors and Past Chairman, George Felos:

It is this writer's opinion that:

- The Board of Directors of "The Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" cannot justify their actions, or the actions of past Chairman, George Felos if The Hospice knowingly placed Terri Schiavo in the care of Felos and his paid/volunteer subordinates without disclosing his role at the Hospice to the court, the public, or the Terri Schiavo's parents.

- The Board of Directors of "The Hospice of The Florida Suncoast" cannot claim to be advocates for their clients if they are not fully open regarding the past or present roles of George Felos with their donors, the courts, or the clients they purport to serve.

Here's a link to that "Spirit and the Law" article about the attorney Felos at:

http://www.sptimes.com/News/052501/...nd_the_la.shtml

Terri is most fortunate to have survived. Her situation should serve as a RED flag to all of us. Have a LIVING WILL and appoint someone YOU trust to execute it.

10 posted on 10/22/2003 6:49:00 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: nmh
Apparently the husband's attorney is and or has been a member of the board of the Hospice - this could be conflict of interest if the Hospice offered testimony as to Terri's condition - is their loyalty to that attorney or to Terri?

THANKS!!! for posting that information.

When my grandmother was dieing, NO hospice would take her in until the final months of her life, and, even then, there was a lengthy waiting list.

Terri Schiavo has been in this hospice for 3 years! That made no sense to me. Your post explains it! Is it okay if I pass this information on to Pete Vere, a canon lawyer, who is advocating for the Schindler family. He just returned from FL where he spent several days with the family.

21 posted on 10/22/2003 7:01:34 AM PDT by NYer ("Close your ears to the whisperings of hell and bravely oppose its onslaughts." ---St Clare Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nmh
Felos is a damn liar, then. I heard him on TV saying there was no money involved. NO MONEY! The media has gone out of control on this one. They have NOT told the truth from day one. And what's up with FOX News?! They seem to be treating this as a non story. I can hardly stand it!

I did send a FAX to our local Channel 47 to complain about their coverage. And I did send a FAX to Gov Bush thanking him for his intervention. But I guess I didn't do enough. I feel like I failed. This is a wake up call for me and maybe for many other people. We need to get active in pro life again before it's too late.
78 posted on 10/22/2003 9:23:11 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nmh
"Terri's advocates claim her teeth are unbrushed, her nails untrimmed,"

This is completely inconsistent with any hospice care I've ever known or heard about. Such treatment would be neglect, not end of life care.
(as an intern, I drew the wrath of the whole nursing staff by noting "oral care, today" in the orders. That was/is their care, a point of pride, and I should have assumed it would happen. I learned a lot that day about what a nurse is and what nursing is.)
88 posted on 10/22/2003 9:31:12 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: nmh
Ack, don't let Greer off so easily. He probably knew about the conflict. If nothing else he denied Terri representation with her AAL. There was one a short while but Greer ignored everything he reported and finally showed him the door. Terri has had no say in this at all.
126 posted on 10/22/2003 12:41:45 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson