Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protests Kill Off 'Flatulence Tax' Plan
CNSNews.com ^ | 10/22/03 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 10/22/2003 2:47:35 AM PDT by kattracks

Pacific Rim Bureau (CNSNews.com) - The New Zealand government has abandoned a controversial plan to tax farmers for their livestock's flatulence, after the proposal prompted widespread protests - and considerable derision.

Opposition parties slammed the Kyoto Protocol-driven move, farmers threatened a nationwide revolt, and a new movement was quickly born.

Fight Against Ridiculous Taxes, with its obvious acronym, became the slogan of farmers' groups, meat processors, and others across the country campaigning to have the left-leaning government of Prime Minister Helen Clark drop the plan.

Announced last June, the proposal sought to charge sheep and cattle farmers a modest levy for each animal in their flocks and herds, saying it would use the money raised to fund research into ways of minimizing their gaseous emissions.

As livestock belch and emit wind, they release methane, and nitrous oxide is released from their waste. Both are "greenhouse gases" - the pollutants blamed by some scientists for global warming.

Because New Zealand is largely pastoral rather than highly-industrialized, its 45 million sheep and 10 million head of cattle produce more than 40 percent of the country's total greenhouse gas emissions.

The flatulence tax idea was part of the Clark government's efforts to meet New Zealand's obligations under the Kyoto Protocol, which requires developed countries to reduce emission by specified amounts.

Although the government was initially adamant that the statutory levy would be charged, and said only the practicalities were subject to negotiation, it eventually backed down under pressure.

In a compromise reached with industry groups, Environment Minister Pete Hodgson and Agriculture Minister Jim Sutton have agreed that research already underway into ways of reducing methane emissions could get additional funding, and thus do away with the need for a levy on farmers.

The campaigners hailed the decision as a victory, although the government denied it was an "embarrassing u-turn" -- as claimed by opposition political parties -- saying the bottom line was that the research be undertaken, and that was happening.

The Federated Farmers of New Zealand, which spearheaded protests, welcomed the move, saying farmers had fought hard in recent months to show the government that the tax was a "ridiculous burden."

"Farmers will be relieved that the government looks to have finally got the FART tax out of its system," federation vice-president Charlie Pedersen said in a statement.

"Farmers said they would not pay the tax and only support research that made sense. As such abandoning the tax is a fantastic victory for farmers."

During the campaign, farmers staged noisy rallies and collected petition signatures, and were buoyed by an opinion poll last August in which 80 percent of respondents opposed the tax - a noteworthy result in a country with an influential environmental lobby.

In one memorable protest, an opposition lawmaker who is also a farmer drove an ancient tractor up the steps of the parliament building in Wellington.

Shane Ardern was charged by police for the stunt, and will appear in court again next month.

Commentators and headline writers had a field day, with such expressions as "ill wind," "raising a stink" and "a lot of hot air" getting plenty of play.

The Federated Farmers organized a poetry competition, inviting farmers to have share their thoughts on the tax in (mostly unpublishable) verse.

"I have never herd a cow break wind, but can't say the same for politicians," wrote one of many aspiring poets. "What about a tax on them, to be levied by our Friesians?"

Ardern, the tractor-driving parliamentarian, welcomed news of the government's back down, saying the proposal had turned New Zealand into an international laughing stock.

See earlier stories:
New Zealand Farmers Threaten Rebellion over 'Flatulence Tax' (July 3, 2003)
Kyoto 'Flatulence Tax' Plan Causes Turbulence in New Zealand (June 23, 2003)





TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2003 2:47:35 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If I recall correctly, Kyoto was opposed unanymously by the Senate. But then-president Bill Clinton attempted to send billions of dollars to North Korea for greenhouse emissions points, based on the voted-down treaty, back during a government shutdown confrontation. Kyoto is popular in third world countries for that very reason: industrialized nations, especially the US, would have to purchase emmissions points from undeveloped countries that were allocated many more emissions points than they needed. Years later, scientists returned to the Ice Age theory, when it appeared that glaciers were expanding and the Gulf Stream was cooling. But that didn't gain much traction. Now they are back to global warming again-- I think. Although, there is also talk of pole flipping.
2 posted on 10/22/2003 3:01:30 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Libs counterattack while Rush is away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good for the New Zealanders! The next step would have been to put a tax on anyone who ate beans. Now they can eat their burritos and frijoles without fear of the TaxMan.
Taco Bell is safe!
3 posted on 10/22/2003 3:04:52 AM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
This whole thread needs a "PULL MUH FINGER" alert blurb!
4 posted on 10/22/2003 4:00:36 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Protests Kill Off 'Flatulence Tax' Plan

Dang, at first I thought the article was going to be about taxing Washington D.C.

5 posted on 10/22/2003 5:02:08 AM PDT by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Knowing the environmentalist they will regroup and force the farmers to administer livestock grade "bean-o"
6 posted on 10/22/2003 5:12:13 AM PDT by catfish1957
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
If i fluff the covers will it be ok?
7 posted on 10/22/2003 5:45:38 AM PDT by sauropod (Fry Mumia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
If I were a farmer, I would claim that I added bean-o to their feed. Then I would claim exemption from the tax as my livestock would no longer emit greenhouse gases. Internal pollution control measures, sort of.
8 posted on 10/22/2003 5:51:21 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
This whole thread needs a "PULL MUH FINGER" alert blurb!

OK, come on people – some has to have a "PULL MUH FINGER" animated gif!

9 posted on 10/22/2003 10:20:03 AM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Only if the Bean-o is 100% environmentally safe, and made of “100% Natural” ingredients. (Of course, many forget that some of the most deadly poisons known are “100% Natural”)
10 posted on 10/22/2003 10:23:04 AM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think we should tax Government.
11 posted on 10/22/2003 10:23:39 AM PDT by PoorMuttly (Operation Enduring Muttly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Hey shaggy...you're safe !!!
12 posted on 10/22/2003 10:26:29 AM PDT by PoorMuttly (Operation Enduring Muttly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly; farmfriend
BWUT
13 posted on 10/23/2003 5:11:45 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room
And you won't miss a thread on FR because e-bot will keep you informed.

14 posted on 10/23/2003 5:18:04 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Excuse me?
15 posted on 10/23/2003 5:20:25 PM PDT by frodolives (Moose bites kan be pretti nasti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Thanks for the heads up!
16 posted on 10/23/2003 7:48:54 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; Carry_Okie; Syncro; Grampa Dave; ElkGroveDan
I remember well the radio news playing over and over the N.Z. farmers chanting...

"We won't pay the fart tax, no bloody way!"

It was right about the time that Gray Davis tripled the car tax and I had visions of all of us "FReepin" the Crapitol chanting...

"We won't pay the car tax, no bleepin way!"

17 posted on 10/23/2003 9:00:10 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Has anyone seen my tagline??? It wasn't to be removed under penalty of LAW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
hahahah!!!
18 posted on 10/23/2003 9:03:33 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Oh Man this is my lucky day Another Cow Farting thread!

Hey has anyone else heard that L.A. and New York are supposed to eventually be under the oceans because we have to many cows and they fart alot?

I just think that is the greatest thing I ever heard!

19 posted on 10/23/2003 9:13:19 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Are yew laffin at me??? I wazunt playin the skin flute!!!
20 posted on 10/23/2003 9:16:31 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Has anyone seen my tagline??? It wasn't to be removed under penalty of LAW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson