1 posted on
10/21/2003 12:51:19 PM PDT by
veronica
To: dennisw; Alouette; SJackson; Brian Allen; yoe; yonif; Yehuda; BenF; Nachum; quidnunc; MadIvan; ...
FYI.
2 posted on
10/21/2003 12:53:44 PM PDT by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: veronica; PhiKapMom; Wolfstar; MeeknMing; onyx; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; hchutch; BOBTHENAILER; ..
Bumping the latest look at Krugman hatred/lies/mantras for president Bush.
3 posted on
10/21/2003 1:11:56 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Get a free FR coffee mug! Donate $10 monthly to Free Republic or 34 cents/day!)
To: veronica
Oh that's right, Krugman teaches economics.
4 posted on
10/21/2003 1:12:33 PM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(The September 11th attacks were clearly Clinton's most consequential legacy. - Rich Lowry)
To: veronica
Here is another look at the insanity of the lunatic, Krugman.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1005259/posts?page=1 excerpts:
Let me illustrate these points with a prominent columnist. As most readers of TCS know, Paul Krugman writes a semiweekly column for The New York Times. I know little about Krugman except that he is an economist. I have been reading his columns (online) for about a year. At first I thought he was a run-of-the-mill liberal critic of a conservative administration. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with that. Indeed, such criticism (loyal opposition) is vital to our democracy. Politics at its best is about policy and principle: about collective goals and constraints on their pursuit. Reasonable, well-informed, well-meaning people can and should disagree about such things. But as the weeks and months went by, I began to detect a certain meanness and unfairness, even a touch of pathology, in Krugman's columns. I now think that he hates President Bush.
The signs of Krugman's hatred are there for all to see. First, he is obsessed. Nearly every column for the past year has been about the Bush administration, and often about the president personally. I assume that Krugman has free rein as far as column topics go (just as I do at TCS), so why he focuses almost exclusively on President Bush requires explanation. Hatred explains it. Second, I have never seen Krugman make a favorable comment, even grudgingly, about President Bush. Someone might say that there is nothing favorable to be said, but that is disingenuous. Nobody is perfectly bad (omnimalevolent) and nobody performs only evil deeds (omnimaleficence). Krugman could prove me wrong by writing an occasional favorable column about the president or his administration. I will not hold my breath waiting for it.
5 posted on
10/21/2003 1:14:42 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Get a free FR coffee mug! Donate $10 monthly to Free Republic or 34 cents/day!)
To: veronica; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please, somebody teach me how to think!
This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!
7 posted on
10/21/2003 1:55:10 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: Doctor Raoul
Enjoy! Taranto scores on the hapless and mismatched Krugman:
"Somewhere in Pakistan," Krugman concludes, "Osama bin Laden must be enjoying this." Bin Laden is a sadistic man indeed if he takes pleasure in watching Krugman's unraveling.
10 posted on
10/21/2003 10:16:42 PM PDT by
BillF
(Support Our Troops http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997137/posts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson