Auschwitz in America

world net daily ^ | 10-18-03 | William J. Federer

[MarMema]

No, in the case of the infant the parents were allowed to choose death and decline all offers of adoption.

The right to die movement says that living wills will make these court cases go away, but there are many, many infants being left to die of neglect by their parents.

The issue is this. If the infant did not have a defect, the courts would step in and stop the imposed death. We are allowing the killing of infants with defects the parents consider unacceptable for quality of life, but would never allow this for an infant who is not "defective".

Recently in Canada a father took his 11 year old daughter into the garage and killed her by running a pipe from the truck into the back seat. The child had cerebral palsy. The outpouring of support for the father was enormous. Most people seemed to believe that the father had done a merciful thing. (Latimer case)

Dick Sobsey says that the killing of children by their parents has since increased enormously, reaching a proportion never before seen in Canada. It is becoming acceptable to euthanize your own children.

Do we then continue to allow parents and doctors to make their own, highly biased decisions about life and death for others? This is family rights?

A recent well-done study proved that doctors make decisions for patients based on their own personal beliefs, and that the decisions made are highly subjective.
One could easily speculate that if you are of a political or religious group that your physician finds objectionable, options for returning to health will not be offered to you.

[pollywog]

Recently in Canada a father took his 11 year old daughter into the garage and killed her by running a pipe from the truck into the back seat. The child had cerebral palsy. The outpouring of support for the father was enormous. Most people seemed to believe that the father had done a merciful thing. (Latimer case) Dick Sobsey says that the killing of children by their parents has since increased enormously, reaching a proportion never before seen in Canada. It is becoming acceptable to euthanize your own children.

GOD HELP US!!!!!!!!!!

[pollywog]

What is happening right now in Florida demonstrates that, for a society to become a mass-murdering society, all that is needed is a few well-placed "pro-life" office-holders, who crumple in the face of a few people who are determined to kill.

Who have also sold their consciences to appease the masses!!!!!

[MarMema]

Dick Sobsey and Latimer case

physician bias

Physician bias

"Age and the extent of organ damage used to be the two most important criteria in determining who in an intensive care unit would be kept on life support and who would not."

[MarMema]

From my link above-

" Currently, in Canada, 80 per cent of murdered children are killed by one or both of their own parents. In the U.S. the equivalent figure is about 55 per cent."

Of course these are not all altruistic killings...

[tpaine]

Do we then continue to allow parents and doctors to make their own, highly biased decisions about life and death for others? This is family rights?
-MM-

---

Do we then continue to allow parents to make their own, highly biased decisions about life and death for others? This is family rights?

Under our constitution, it certainly is their right.
Who do you propose should have this power?
-- Try writing an amendment giving this power to someone/some-group other than parents or legal guardians..

Two bits you can't. -- Or won't even try..
--- Anyone?

[MarMema]

Susan Smith and Robert Latimer, A Tale of Two Murders

[MHGinTN]

No need for an ammendment ... all states and the fed have murder statutes. It is the enforcement of those already written statues that is lacking as the society slides into the embrace of eugenics and euthanasia.

[MarMema]

I suppose we should stop prosecuting the likes of Susan Smith, then, who also said she killed her children out of love for them, and also should have the right to kill them.

[Petronski]

Lebens unwertenlebens

Life unworthy of life....the Nazi terminology for 'useless eaters.'

The program to liquidate the disabled was given the innocuous euphemism "vernichtung lebens unwertenlebens" (fir-NISH-tung LAY-bunz un-VAIR-tin-lay-bunz), literally, 'obliterating life unworthy of life.'

It has arrived, though now we refer to 'quality of life' or 'euthanasia.' More euphemisms for a vulgar winnowing of the human herd that would have put a gleam in Himmler's eye and a sardonic grin on Hitler's face.

Resident deutchophones and historians are invited to comment on or correct my rendering of these terms.

[Petronski]

Are you saying that the government forced the responsible family members to decline these offers?

Are you speaking of the Schiavo case specifically? I'm not aware of anyone on Terri's side refusing governmental offers to take responsibility for her care.

Rather the opposite, it seems to me, as I see them scouring the country for a court that would let them intervene...to no avail.

[fishbabe]

want to know something even more chilling?the nazis got their eugenics program from us...we had put one in place long before they had,they just took it to the next logical step....

[Petronski]

As an aside, referring to vernichtung lebens unwertenlebens, the Nazi term for death camps like Auschwitz/Birkenau was 'vernichtungslager' (fihr-nish-tung-SLAW-guhr), 'obliteration camp.'

[tpaine]

Indeed, put 'them' on trial for murder.

That's been tried before, and failed..

Thus, -- your next option is to mind your own families business, and let your neighbor mind his.. -- It's our constitutional way..

[MarMema]

"collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in---your nation, your people--- is not the world you were born in at all."

A good description for many of us.

[MHGinTN]

BWahahaha ... your usual taunting reply. Did you miss the part about the statutes not being enforced? There is no substitute for the sovereigns of a Republic actually doing their responsibility of oversight in the election process.

[SpaceBar]

Here is where it all got started.

[Avoiding_Sulla]

through the medical establishment and philosophical elite's adoption of the "quality of life" concept in place of the "sanctity of life."

In May 2002 I posted the following observation:
Here we have more of what I've been demonstrating is the paradigm shift. Incrementally moving away from "protect all innocent human life" and moving toward "improve the quality of human life."

Sad to say, but don't be too shocked (perhaps this is why you reposted Federer's editorial) should you witness a marked lack of response to this observation and summary assessment about world leaders' current attitude. I've been there.

I've likened the amazing non-responsiveness to the nervousness you may have felt when, as a child, you played musical chairs. Because the elitist's updated version of that game is more lethal, and worry over being noticed may add to the concern of most people, this may explain the deafening silence.

For a listing of many other threads which demonstrate death cultivation in acton, please see this: Evidence of Efforts Aimed at Leveling Humanity.

[dixiegrrl]

What makes me mad is that Andrea Yates is going to be force fed by a feeding tube and Terri has hers removed! I guess if you kill your children you have more of a right to live than somebody who is disabled.

[tpaine]

"BWahahaha" ... your usual inane reply.

Get a brain..