Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly on Media Bias
BillOReilly.com. ^ | Saturday, October 18, 2003 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 10/18/2003 9:08:20 AM PDT by joobers

Saturday, October 18, 2003

Media Bias

A recent Gallup Poll says nearly half the country believes the media are biased left, and this poll proves one thing: The people who told the pollsters that are smarter than I am.

For most of my journalistic career, I did not believe there was institutional bias on the part of the media. I felt there was an exclusionary bias. That is, certain opinions and issues simply were ignored by the major media. For example, I worked for two network news organizations, and the only time you'd hear a pro-life opinion would be if some nut blew up an abortion clinic.

But I've now learned the hard way that liberal bias is a way of life for many media organizations. Over the past few months, I have been slimed, smeared and pilloried primarily by leftists who do not approve of my commentary.

I am not whining, I'm reporting. And to put things into perspective, what actors Mel Gibson and Arnold Schwarzenegger have recently suffered at the hands of the left-wing press makes my situation look like an episode of "Happy Days." These guys have been viciously attacked, and even their own fathers have been used as bludgeons against them. Awful doesn't even begin to describe it.

In my case, the attacks are very personal but also designed to advance the far-left agenda.

Item: When my new book, "Who's Looking Out for You?" hit No. 1 on The New York Times Best-Seller List, it was described as an "attack" vehicle. In reality, the book is a primer for everyday Americans on how to achieve success and stability. In the past 10 years, only two people have had three No. 1 nonfiction bestsellers on the Times list: Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and your humble correspondent. Yet somehow the Times has not gotten around to reviewing any of my books, while tomes by the liberal "satirists" are given major exposure.

Item: People Magazine assigned a man who loathes me (I know, I know it's hard to believe) to review "Who's Looking Out for You?" Newsflash -- he didn't like it.

Item: A National Public Radio interviewer insisted on reading that People Magazine review on the air during her chat with me. When I strongly suggested she read the very positive review in Publisher's Weekly magazine as well, she refused.

Item: Matt Lauer on "The Today Show" sat there smirking as one of the far-left "satirists" defamed me. When my publicist called "The Today Show" asking for a chance to respond, the program turned me down.

To be fair, Barbara Walters gave me fair play on "The View" and did challenge the "satirist," so there is not a left-wing monolith in play here. But there is no question that scores of left-winger press people have now emerged from the closet and are out for blood, the same way hard right-wing ideologues were during the Clinton administration. However, the hard right did not have access to the elite media, and that's a key.

The assault from the left is directly because of the unprecedented success of Fox News Channel. Perceived by the "progressive" community to be conservative, the network drives the far left absolutely crazy. That politically correct bastion CNN has been decimated in the ratings by FNC, and traditionalists finally have a place on television to put forth their points of view. Of course, liberal voices are given the same opportunity on Fox, but it doesn't matter to the far-left ideologues. For decades, they controlled the agenda on TV news. Now that's over. All voices are heard.

So, the far-left is counter-attacking, and God help you if you're in their sights. My name is no longer Bill O'Reilly, it's "gasbag," "bully," "liar" and "blowhard." Those descriptions are not confined to opinion pieces but are routinely used in hard news stories, as well. The far-left media has loaded up on sticks and stones, and is eager to hurl them.

There is some good news, though. Never again can many news organizations claim any kind of fairness or nonpartisanship. They have been flushed out of the weeds for all to see. Excuse me for a moment, something just went whizzing by my head.

© 2003 BillOReilly.com.

More Bill O'Reilly articles:


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccrm; mediabias; oreilly; presstitutes

1 posted on 10/18/2003 9:08:20 AM PDT by joobers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joobers
Bill's just waking up to liberal media bias huh? Some are slow learners I guess.

Prairie
2 posted on 10/18/2003 9:14:28 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
A National Public Radio interviewer

Of course, liberal voices are given the same opportunity on Fox, but it doesn't matter to the far-left ideologues. For decades, they controlled the agenda on TV news

At taxpayer's expense (Bill seems to miss that point).

3 posted on 10/18/2003 9:19:58 AM PDT by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: joobers
I think the last 10 articles this guy has written as well as the last 200 talking points commentary he does on his show, he has used the words "In my new book who`s looking out for you"...Yeah, Bill...We know who`s looking out for you.
5 posted on 10/18/2003 9:38:52 AM PDT by metalboy (Liberals-Nuke `em from orbit. It`s the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
Bill O'Reilly wrote a book?
6 posted on 10/18/2003 9:56:02 AM PDT by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
there are lots of good democrats out there. the trouble is that the media has been very clever in slanting the news to the left just enough to keep them from knowing whats the truth.

now with talk radio and fox news maybe the good ones will see the light. wonder if maybe a few did in the recall election
7 posted on 10/18/2003 10:09:28 AM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
***"Who's Looking Out for You?" ***

Don't bother, O'Reilly. We don't need a nanny with an ego.
8 posted on 10/18/2003 10:10:53 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
Another essay of piercing insight by Bill "It's all about me" O'Reilly. It must drive O'Reilly crazy that "ego" is only a 3 letter word.
9 posted on 10/18/2003 10:13:49 AM PDT by Blue Screen of Death (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
Bill was slow to see the obvious. Until they directly slimed him, he was delusional about the very media he worked within. Like David Horowitz, Tammy Bruce and Christopher Hitchins, reformed liberals who felt the backlash, he will increasingly see the Left for what it is: angry hateful cowardice.

It'll be fun to witness Bill's slow transformation. Assuming he keeps his current gigs, he will become a powerful voice for repairing America. God grant Bill O'Rielly insight and strength.
10 posted on 10/18/2003 10:22:57 AM PDT by moodyskeptic (weekend warrior in the culture war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: joobers; *CCRM; *Presstitutes; yall
Good article ! Thanks for posting it ...


12 posted on 10/19/2003 2:19:05 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joobers
Item: A National Public Radio interviewer insisted on reading that People Magazine review on the air during her chat with me. When I strongly suggested she read the very positive review in Publisher's Weekly magazine as well, she refused.

I'm usually underwhelmed by O'Reilly, but I must admit that hearing him chop Terry Gross off at the knees in the NPR Fresh Air interview mentioned above made my day. She tried to maneuver him into an embarrassing corner and he would have none of it. Especially satisfying was when O'Reilly forced her to admit that the soft-balling, chatting-amongst-comrades tone she took with Al Franken was very different than the tone she took with him.

13 posted on 10/19/2003 2:29:28 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson