[Yo-Yo]

This entire survey is a thinly disguised liberal hit piece on conservatives.

Example:

Exposure to News and Frequency of Misperceptions among Bush and Democratic Nominee Supporters

Average frequency of misperception among:

Bush supporters who follow the news:
Not closely at all - 40%
Not very closely - 43%
Somewhat closely - 44%
Very closely - 54%

Democratic nominee supporters who follow the news:
Not closely at all - 22%
Not very closely - 20%
Somewhat closely - 16%
Very closely - 11%

It seems that a "misperception" of the news means not buying the liberal slant of the news.

[AZFolks]

This sanctimonious ass! He reminds me of the arrogant professor who only will accept the answer he wants. I want him to define what he means by a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam. If Ansar el Islam is a connection, if one of "Mohammed el Caboom's" crowd being patched up in Baghdad after Tora Bora is a connetion, if the Al Qaeda who killed our ambassador to Jordan (Mr Foley) is a connection, then I guess there was a connection and we Foxies are not dumb. Perhaps he should read Laurie Milroy's book to get an eye opener. I want him to define weapons of mass destruction. If work on UAVs with a longer range than prohibited is proof, if a centrifuge hidden under a rose bush is proof, if botulinum toxin is proof, if biological labs are proof, if paying North Korea for missles is proof, if manufacturing fuel for scuds which they weren't supposed to have is proof, again we Foxies are not idiots. I want him to explain what Saddam would have done if France and some of the other dilitantes had their way and we had withdrawn sanctions! If the "world" is defined as Muslim countries, Fance, Germany and Belgium and assorted other lilliputians,then we Foxies are guilty. This guy reminds me of the Useful Idiots in the cold war where we were always the bad guys. I usually don't respond with such anger but this crowd is really getting under my skin!