You, sir, are the one who doesn't understand the "reality of the situation." You obviously have not read ONE of the threads and links about Terri. I suggest you get to it; you're embarassing yourself here.
I hope and pray that YOU don't ever end up like Terri! But if YOU do I hope that people show more compassion for YOU than YOU seem to have for other people!!!
This is a perfect example. After having watched some close relatives go through this, I asked my family (and they asked me) to not allow them to be artificially kept alive, if any of us got to a vegetative state, beyond any hope of recovery. I know first-hand what such measures do, and what the ultimate conclusion will still be. None of us (in my family) want to be brought so low...
The husband likely put her in this condition.
That is for a court of law to decide. You are making assumptions.
He is now obstructing justice. Do you think it's a good presidence to have on the books to allow a criminal to be in charge of the evidence.
If he is responsible, then it's very unlikely that anything new will be found at an autopsy, that hasn't already been determined by CAT scans, MRIs and the like. Again, you're making assumptions.
You obviously have not read ONE of the threads and links about Terri. I suggest you get to it; you're embarassing yourself here.
Nope. NOT embarrassed in the slightest. I ask an honest question, and I'm attacked for asking it??? And for the record, no, I haven't bothered to read the previous threads, since (as I already explained) I don't get the disconnect from reality that seems to have befallen all of the breathless, emotional participants on this subject.
I ask again, why???