You misread, I said the evidence is clear that you are in denial.
Re. Rush again, he hasn't even been charged, and you're going bonkers
I'm going bonkers? LOL, you poor apologists are tripping all over yourselves to defend the boob because you tied your wagon to a fallen star. I'm not even excited much less bonkers.
You seem to have a problem understanding my position. I'll go even slower for you this time. I don't care if he is charged. I don't care if he is convicted. I think the law is BS.
None of that would change whether he did it or not. If he did it, he's a hypocrite. I knew that anyway so I don't care.
And he did it, despite your goofy insistence on the legal systems minutia.
If you really think that if he had a prescription for all the drugs has admitted to be addicted to, and which he bought and you think he bought them at a pharmacy, you are delusional.
Yeah, pesky ol' Constitution.
He did what, exactly? C'mon. Go on record, Mr. I don't need no steenkin' legal system.
Tell us right now, what did Rush do? He what? Bought pills? How many pills, from who, when? And these pills were for him and him alone? How much money did he spend on these drugs?
And you were there? Or did you read this somewhere, perhaps in a publication where a person was getting paid to "juice it up"?