Did you read my post?
I don't know anything about this case. The complainant, for all I know, is a nun.
What I do know is that if a complainant alleges nonconsensual intercourse such that the state charges a defendant with a felony, the state must prove the charge-must prove that she did not consent.
In this regard, her testimony is important but not conclusive-otherwise, why have a trial?
What facts would you suggest the defense be able to use to create reasonable doubt of nonconsent?
Your suggestion, of having intercourse with a hundred men in a hundred hours, would certainly be part of a reasonable doubt defense.
Do you disagree?