The doctor apparently supports homosexuality:
http://www.thedccenter.org/images/Fall20007Fundraiser.pdf
This is an “LGBT” fundraiser and the location for it is listed as the home of this doctor and another man, who, it turns out, is the doctor’s “husband”:
“MY HUSBAND AND I HAD A CHOICE of marrying in either California or Massachusetts in July 2008 — the only two states where it was then legal. The West won and we set off, not knowing that we would be one of only 18,000 same-sex couples to marry in the big blue state before Proposition 8 foreclosed that option four months later.”
https://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/the-night-i-danced-with-liberace
He says, though, that “he’s not a Democrat.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/richard-e-cytowic-md
His Psychology Today article:
My wife will confirm, I am to the right of Attila the Hun on hetero-sexuality.
If you use your brain in properly, you might understand the article is NOT about homosexuality. The context is this doctor’s claimed expertise as a qualified psychiatrist, which you are not, and so his opinion on Ted Cruz’s facial characteristics has 10,000 times more credibility than you because are basically uneducated in this field of study.
What you are doing is using the tactics used by liberals, which is when they can not respond in context, they bifurcate into ad hominem about the person. I have a feeling you may not understand what ad hominem means, so here is the explanation:
An argument or reaction directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.