To: Texas Eagle
Just get it under the Trillion mark and we can sell it to the suckers.
They didn't do their homework on this to start with. They could have massaged the numbers to around $500 billion, it's just a number, nobody’s going to hold them to it.
8 posted on
06/20/2009 9:05:38 AM PDT by
Recon Dad
(Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - MARSOC DAD)
To: Recon Dad
If they go from 1.6 trill to 900 bil either they cut out services or they cut out waste. If they cut waste, why didn’t they do that the first time?
11 posted on
06/20/2009 9:09:01 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
To: Recon Dad
They didn't do their homework on this to start with. They could have massaged the numbers to around $500 billion, it's just a number, nobody’s going to hold them to it.I think they did do their homework, except they can't find a way to keep it under $1 trillion.....it is that large, burdensome and out of control already.
Just imagine what reality will look like.
13 posted on
06/20/2009 9:09:45 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Recon Dad
They could have massaged the numbers to around $500 billion, it's just a number, nobody’s going to hold them to it. Amen. The only numbers they care about are poll numbers.
It's too bad we can't call Gallup, Rasmussen, Zogby, etc.
Or can we?
20 posted on
06/20/2009 9:16:43 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: Recon Dad
Like Bush’s “$300 billion” prescription plan? Now up to $600 billion?
28 posted on
06/20/2009 9:56:55 AM PDT by
silverleaf
("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson