[wideawake]

Rice is pro-abortion. She's good on defense, but she's not a national leader. She won't get my vote.

I do like Cheney very much, however.

[netmilsmom]

Condi is "reluctantly" pro-choice. Until I know more about what this means (she is refusing to talk about it, but will as a candidate), I will be for her. When she explains herself farther (to vote pro-choice) or (as I suspect) renounces that stance, I will decide for/against her. Until this is explained, I have to go with her. If she intends to remain pro-choice, then I am wrong.
Are you willing to take someone who is less of a threat to H. Clinton and is pro-life while Condi can defeat Clinton while she votes pro-life no matter what her convictions are? I think as long as she runs pro-life, she is tons better than Clinton.
I like the "Rice/Bush 2008" ticket right now.

[Bringbackthedraft]

Condi may not fit the profile of a national leader but! It doesn't mater who is in the leadership position, its who they appoint that maters. This was told to me by a Democrat Biggie when Clinton was running for his first term. Does Clinton fit the profile of a national leader? I think not. Nor did he appoint really qualified people and we need not get into that discussion. I think Condi has the country's interest at heart not her ego. She'll do fine, she knows who to appoint to the cabinet.

[VRWCmember]

Rice is pro-abortion.

I've heard this repeated here on FR many times, but I've not seen confirmation of it, and based on much of what I've read about and by her I doubt that it is true. I could be wrong on this, but until I hear her take a pro-abortion position on record, I withhold judgment on this one.