You haven't answered any of the mentioned questions either.
And apparently, you took a comment by a poster and tried to pass it as what was in the original article.
Isn't that the truth?
I will say that after a multitude of questions by myself and other posters, you did mention that IT (the idea that the jury acquitted for Christmas) was a post by someone. You did not ever come back and say it was not part of the original news article or really clarify, even though asked repeatedly.
Do you see why I question what you say? When you (most likely UNINTENTIONALLY) mislead us?
And remember, As a person, and fellow FR poster I give you my respect. I attack the things you say, and do not want you to believe I am attacking you. When what I say comes off as attacking you as a person, I am sorry. That is my fault.
To: UCANSEE2; cyncooper
In my original post, I stated someone else's post as a fact. I later stated that that was how I remembered it from a thread.
That person works with the victim's brother.
I seem to recall something was taken as gospel truth by pro-Westies because "Someone who works with Damon" said it. Remember, cyn?
posted on 01/15/2003 4:44:16 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson