Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
Why is Westerfield on trial instead of someone else?

Maybe they did not want to look?

I read that the detectives didn't gather evidence right . It seems they didn't take pictures as they should have before they cut the squares from the jacket and the rug.

Maybe they are trying to cover up their icompetence? Maybe one of them did it and is trying to frame him?

The little I have read that they have on him doesn't even add up to an indictment.

Westerfield was never placed in the house. But maybe she wandered outside and he grabbed her there. But they are saying he went into a house and took her, leaving no prints and she didn't have any either.What is going on here?

452 posted on 08/14/2002 2:40:16 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: carenot
I guess that explains why the jury is still out. If the evidence is that weak, he should have testified and he'd be walking right now.
504 posted on 08/14/2002 3:20:57 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson