[UCANSEE2]

Let's see. Let me sum up the case for the Prosecution.

No direct Evidence. Lot's of 'invisible' evidence, including black boots, blue blanket, etc.

Fiber evidence that COULD or COULD not be proof.

Hair found in MH sink trap. 1 Hair. Could be any of the VD's including Brenda.

2 spots which were not proved to be blood, just presumed to be. DNA matched 12 of 13 markers. Takes 25 matches to be conclusive. TESTS had to be faked, experts had to mislead jury into believing 12 of 13 means perfect match.

We don't know how he got in, if he got in, how or where he got to Danielle, where he took her, what he did.

All we know is SHE IS DEAD, and therefore HE IS GUILTY!

[connectthedots]

When you get right down to it; it's all about the bug evidence. DW should get on his knees and thank God the police started their surviellance of him sa soon as they did. If the police hadn't, the bug evidence would have worked against him instead of for him.

I would not go so far as to say DW absolutely didn't do it, but I don't think he did. What I will say is there is so much doubt and the evidence as a whole greatly favors the defense.