South Africa With VS Without White People

Angela Rose on YouTube ^ | Sep 16, 2026 | Angela Rose

[Morgana]

From 2013 to today. This video shows extreme devastation and havoc.

---

TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: bigotry; hatesite; leftism; leftist; racism; splc

[Nateman]

To be fair it is also South Africa with and without Communism. The Soviet Union wanted to deprive America of the resources of Africa so it concentrated on establishing Communism there. They used racial strife as the wedge issue to get that done .

Their plan, unfortunately, worked and its evil has since outlived them

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Video Transcript Summary

The video presents a highly critical view of post-apartheid South Africa, arguing that the country—particularly Johannesburg and white-owned farms—has rapidly declined due to race-based policies, corruption, crime, and discrimination against the white/Afrikaner minority. It interweaves before-and-after visuals, political commentary, clips of South African and U.S. officials, and personal stories.

Urban decline in Johannesburg

The video opens with footage of present-day Johannesburg CBD described as filled with trash, unmaintained roads, homelessness, street vendors, loitering, and conditions likened to a “war zone” or worse than a typical third-world city. It contrasts this with images from around 2014–2017 showing the same locations (streets, corners, neighborhoods, bridges) as relatively clean, well-maintained, and functional, with greenery, intact sidewalks, working infrastructure, and orderly public spaces. Specific examples include destroyed sidewalks, toppled stop signs, dying trees, graffiti, burnt-looking buildings, and informal encampments under once-nice bridges. The narrator attributes the rapid deterioration to mass unemployment, lack of opportunities, and the reduced role of white people in the economy and maintenance of infrastructure.

Race-based policies, BEE, and land issues

The video claims white South Africans face systemic prejudice in employment and university access (despite education), with affirmative-action/“empowerment” laws (BEE/B-BBEE) prioritizing Black, Coloured, and Indian citizens while disadvantaging whites. It highlights land reform, including expropriation without compensation, arguing that productive white-owned farms have been transferred and subsequently neglected or stripped, leading to ruin. One example shows a formerly profitable farm now in disrepair after being given over by the government.

Farm attacks and murders of white farmers are emphasized as especially severe, with descriptions of violent, dehumanizing crimes (including claims of torture, rape, and ritual elements), and references to memorials of crosses marking victims. The narrator frames these as enabled or insufficiently addressed by government rhetoric and policy.

Political statements and U.S. response

• Cyril Ramaphosa (South African president) is shown defending the laws as constitutional “empowerment” measures to redress apartheid-era discrimination against Black people (and some others, including white women), insisting they are not racist and do not mirror the explicit racial prohibitions of the past.
• The video counters that the policies function as anti-white discrimination, limiting jobs and land ownership for whites.
• Marco Rubio is quoted announcing U.S. visa restrictions targeting foreign nationals who enact or enable race-based discrimination, incite violence, or support land confiscation without compensation in South Africa. He criticizes the South African government for economic destruction via racial grievance politics against Afrikaners and for failing to address rural crime and dehumanizing rhetoric.
• A U.S. ambassador is cited warning of further escalatory measures if South Africa does not change course.
• References are made to Donald Trump confronting Ramaphosa with video evidence of farm attacks and conditions during a White House meeting, and to Elon Musk’s criticisms (including that South African laws are “super racist,” that Starlink faces ownership/demographic requirements under BEE, and that current anti-white measures exceed apartheid’s anti-Black laws in some respects). Musk is also shown sharing a friend’s on-the-ground report: Johannesburg as a “ruin” (non-working traffic lights, extreme poverty for most Blacks alongside elite enrichment via corrupt tenders, e.g., inflated hospital food prices), high danger even in nicer Cape Town areas at night, and ongoing corruption.

Personal story and reactions

A prominent segment features Jason Bartlett, a white South African farmer who relocated to a farm in North Alabama, USA. In a cheerful video, he expresses relief at living without fear of murder, rape, torture, livestock killings, or theft—contrasting this with what he presents as a normalized weekly risk for farmers in South Africa. He praises American safety, quiet, and opportunity, and mentions going to church. The video notes positive online reactions (including from Elon Musk, who predicted Bartlett would contribute economically and commit zero crime) and welcomes him as a productive immigrant. The narrator uses this to underscore the danger faced by remaining white farmers in South Africa.

Broader commentary and historical claims

The video criticizes land-return rhetoric (“Africa belongs to Africans,” land to chiefs/traditional leaders/the state without compensation) as historical revisionism that ignores groups such as the Khoisan and frames Bantu/Nguni peoples as the sole rightful owners. It shows large crowds chanting related slogans and links this ideology to violence against farmers. Comparisons are drawn to U.S. progressive politics (e.g., calls for reparations, challenges to private property, figures like Zohran Mamdani) as similarly dangerous if allowed to advance. It notes South Africa’s own deportations of other Africans (e.g., Nigerians) and contrasts productive white South African refugees/immigrants in the U.S. with narratives of entitlement.

Corruption examples include inflated government tenders enriching a small elite while the broader Black population remains poorer. Cape Town is presented as relatively more functional due to tourism, while the overall trajectory is described as failure for most citizens.

Closing message

The narrator expresses support for U.S. actions protecting against the export of these policies, views South Africa as a cautionary example of what happens when racial grievance, expropriation without compensation, and weakened rule of law take hold, and urges viewers to stay informed. The tone throughout is alarmist and partisan, framing the situation as “apartheid 2.0” or worse, with white (especially Afrikaner) farmers as a particularly vulnerable minority whose experiences are ignored by much of the international left.

Overall thesis of the video: South Africa’s post-1994 trajectory under ANC-led policies of racial redress has produced urban decay, economic dysfunction, corruption, high violence (especially against white farmers), and institutionalized discrimination against whites—outcomes the video attributes primarily to the sidelining of white competence and property rights rather than to other factors. It celebrates individual escapes to safer countries like the U.S. and endorses external pressure (U.S. visa measures) in response.

[Morgana]

Thank you 😊

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[Organic Panic]

Das rayciss....

[Morgana]

Das retarded. I can’t believe some of the other videos out there about this.

DA white man built them a railroad that should have lasted 100 years or more. GONE! They tore up the rails to sell for scrap metal. I about cried.

Even in this modern age it’s the railroad that keeps an infrastructure going.

[srmanuel]

Although the Soviets may have exploited racial strife, they didn’t create the situation, IMO, South Africa was run by a racial minority that produced a modern first world country, once that was removed, South Africa began to revert to its base level instincts, which is tribal savages fighting each other.

Once all the whites in South Africa are either killed off or have moved out, the remain black Africans will revert back to tribal warfare, and South Africa will be nothing, but a bunch of warring tribes constantly engaged in battle.

[Nateman]

Africa is definitely an example to the world. A bad example. So much so wrong! A low bell curve people , Islam and Communism all mixed together into one messed up continent! The REAL bad news is that while the birth rates in the rest of the World are falling below replacement levels in Africa the population continues to grow. That means they will want to come over here when only the crazy Democrats would want them!

[FLT-bird]

[FLT-bird]

[ComputerGuy]

The differences in intelligence are significant. They cannot be explained by culture.

[nonliberal]

Apartheid was in place for a reason.

[Rlsau1]

Rhodesia 2.0. Different time, different people, same results.

[Lowell1775]

“South Africa with and without Communism.”

Name a well run majority Black country...or city for that matter....same same Arab....other than Spain, sometimes....and Uruguay, 20% of assets/land owned by Anglo outsiders like the Bush Family....Hispanic.

I’ll wait.

We are different.

But what do I know and I do not feel strongly about it.

Jesus-Mercy-Peace.

[NFHale]

“RE “das rayciss”

Yeah recognizing the reality that those people create tends to trigger them… everywhere they go.

[Chickensoup]

Actually one can go to many cities in US and see same effects as Whites withdraw and blacks take over.

[GOPJ]

A prominent segment features Jason Bartlett, a white South African farmer who relocated to a farm in North Alabama, USA. In a cheerful video, he expresses relief at living without fear of murder, rape, torture, livestock killings, or theft—contrasting this with what he presents as a normalized weekly risk for farmers in South Africa. He praises American safety, quiet, and opportunity, and mentions going to church. The video notes positive online reactions (including from Elon Musk, who predicted Bartlett would contribute economically and commit zero crime) and welcomes him as a productive immigrant. The narrator uses this to underscore the danger faced by remaining white farmers in South Africa.

Let's fly millions of white South Africans to central American and present them as people 'willing to die' to be free (proof their willingness to cross the dangerous Rio Grande) and see if the gullible liberal bimbos and vile liberal pretentious 'men' of the New York Times and Washington Post can be fooled when WE bring in Republican voters. I'm betting the liars in the MSM will 'catch on' within days - not the endless years of their lies about illegals...

The MSM WANTED to be played for fools by democrats because it helped their team. Eff the NYTimes and all their sycophants down the river. Let's bring in 10 million new conservative voters and see if the MSM and democrat nonprofits will 'play stupid' for us.

[BradyLS]

I get it, but…

…how does it explain California?

[Bonemaker]

Exactly...just like Rhodesia..