Posted on 09/13/2026 2:31:01 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
In a blurry red, visually cryptic post on X.com, Tesla announced the launch date for its long-promised second generation Roadster: 10.01. Although the image and text in the post itself don’t confirm that the announcement is indeed about Roadster, Tesla posted a link to go with it, to the Roadster page on Tesla.com, which makes it indisputable: come October 1, we’re getting a big update on the second-generation Tesla Roadster and it may have rockets mounted on top. Or... big searchlights. Or possibly snow blower nozzles. Who knows? The image is really blurry.
If you recall, back on November 16, 2017, Tesla unveiled the second-generation Roadster at the Tesla Semi event. CEO Elon Musk said at the time that production of the vehicle would begin in 2020 and that Roadster 2.0 would hit 60 mph in 1.9 secondss, hit a top speed of 250+ mph, seat four people, and have a 200-kWh battery good for 620 miles of range. All for a base price of $200,000 or $250,000 if you want a special “Founders Series.”
Tesla originally promised Roadster 2.0 production for 2020, then the dates began to slide, from 2021... to 2022... to 2023... to you get the picture. These postponements were made mostly during Tesla shareholder updates, and were often accompanied by updates from Musk and additional performance promises.
Will there we rockets that make the Roadster fly to 60 mph in under one second? We shall see on October 1.
In 2018, Musk announced a “SpaceX option package” of approximately 10 small rocket thrusters, arranged around the roadster. He reiterated this SpaceX rocket thruster package in 2020 and then in 2024 claimed that Tesla and SpaceX had radically increased the Roadster’s design goals, describing it as a collaboration between the two companies. Per Musk, the new Roadster would be able to accelerate from 0–60 mph in less than one second, calling that “the least interesting part,” and suggested it might “fly a little.” He promised a production-design reveal by the end of 2024 and vehicle shipments in 2025.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Tesla has officially confirmed an October 1 reveal event in Waco, Texas (ninety minutes north of Tesla’s Austin headquarters), for the next-generation Roadster, sending invitations to reservation holders alongside a new countdown on its website.
Tesla on X: "Go for launch"
"Roads? We don't need roads"
And all for the low, low price of $200,000-$250,000. /sarc
Cold Thruster Grok calculations. I have not verified:
0-60 mph (26.8 m/s) in 1.1 s is average acceleration of 24.4 m/s², or ~2.5 g.
The Base tire potential (from claimed 1.9 s / ~10 kNm wheel torque) is ~1.4 g on a ~2,000 kg car.
Extra ~1.1 g requires ~22 kN sustained cold-gas thrust. Total impulse: 22 kN × 1.1 s = 24.2 kNs.
Typical cold-gas air/N₂ exhaust velocity ≈ 700 m/s (Isp ≈ 71 s).
Gas mass ≈ 34.6 kg.
At ~250 bar / 300 K (density ≈ 250 kg/m³) storage volume ≈ 0.14 m³ (140 L).
So one-shot to add the incremental 1.1 g requires a 140 liter tank at 250 bar.
Tesla doesn’t need a roadster, they just need to replace the idiotic Cybertruck with something more practical that real truck guys would buy and use as a real truck.
The Cyberpunk is a dismal failure. They sold 9000 units all of last year, with 2000 of those going to Musk’s own companies. Good grief.
Replace the idiot Cyberpunk already. That would have far more impact on the market than another toy like a Tesla roadster.
Wasn’t the Cybertruck supposed to sell 250,000 units per year. Now down to 7,000.
Replace it already, yet Musk stubbornly sticks with it. Big mistake.
Only a quarter million dollars. What a deal!
The Cybersuck is without a doubt the ugliest vehicle on the road.
I still think the Pontiac Aztec is still the ugliest vehicle ever made.
Walter White drove one in Breaking Bad.
It is not just Tesla. Ford discontinued it's Lightning F150 EV. GM still sells EV trucks but is mostly a rounding error compared to ICE trucks...
A case of function over form. Not my cup of tea, but apparently it’s quite popular.
I was thinking in terms of what’s actually on the roads today. It’s been years since I’ve seen an Aztec.
Search on Google for the ugliest cars ever. The Aztec is well represented. I think it was, in part, the inspiration for the Family Truckster in the National Lampoon Vacation movie.
That cold gas isp will drop as the pressure and temperature drop during the N2 blow down.
The Cybersuck seems popular with those who cover them with wraps advertising their businesses. People do notice them, which is, after all, the whole purpose of advertising.
True. Specific impulse will be less than shown.
A larger tank won’t be practical.
The whole concept is nuts.
Good point. It does attract attention.
Remember how Tesla initially promoted the Cybersuck as having a base price around $40K. When they finally arrived, the price was much higher, considering that they initially only offered the highest price version, and the cheapest, which arrived later, was around $60K.
Will they try the same trick with the Roadster?
“I think it was, in part, the inspiration for the Family Truckster in the National Lampoon Vacation movie.”
The original movie with the Truckster came out in the 80s. The Aztek came out in 2001. Perhaps the Truckster was the inspiration for the Aztek.
LOL! You might be right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.