Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/05/2026 5:26:45 AM PDT by dennisw
Lindsay Clancy supporters donating to her parents' fundraiser have raised more than $1 million with contributions rolling in almost every minute amid a newly increased target.
On Friday, the fundraiser shared an update after Clancy's trial collapsed stating that its new goal is $3 million.
It came as Clancy's grueling six-week trial ended in a mistrial after the 12-person jury was deadlocked because one juror held out on a unanimous acquittal.
The former nurse and mother faced first-degree murder charges in the deaths of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and baby Callan, eight months.
She was accused of murdering the three children in cold blood before attempting to take her own life in 2023 in her Duxbury, Massachusetts, home.
Clancy's defense argued that the shocking triple-killing was a result of postpartum psychosis and a failure in maternal healthcare.
While the prosecution argued that she was a killer, hundreds of supporters who never met Clancy have begged to differ, offering financial support to her parents Michael, 70, and Paula Musgrove, 73, during the trial.
However, the GoFundMe, launched by total stranger to the family Brandee Mulligan, is replete with messages of support for Lindsay directly, despite its existence also sparking backlash.
Amid speculation that the fundraiser is being investigated, a GoFundMe spokesman confirmed to the Daily Mail that it is 'verified' and reports it is being disabled are 'not accurate.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The Musgrove Family Fund -— Gofundme
$1,165,857 raised of Goal of $3M
34.3K donations
Lindsay Clancy should be shot like the monster she is.
Good. She can keep her prison canteen stocked up.
and they say crime does not pay
Yes. But it does say something that her husband’s mother spook positively for her. That’s very rare.
Do we know that? Has that been shared? I would have guessed any other combo but not an 11-1 for acquittal among them.
A number and list of all the donors should be kept in order to know the size of the mental facility needed to house them.
I thought GoFundMe’s policy was to not allow accounts for people accused of murder..........
Without knowing any details, it might just mean that her mother-in-law is a kind person who sees the best in others.
This is merely an example of how pathologically sick and morally bankrupt some in our society are. This criminal woman murdered her children with her bare hands, strangling them to death. Do these “supporters” think the children enjoyed their mother chasing them, catching them and strangling them to death? Ghouls!!!
Yes, we do know that. Also, the defense attorney stated that it was one of the three male jurors.
Which in Massachusetts is apparently hunky-dory.
BRAVE AI:
GoFundMe’s Terms of Service explicitly prohibit fundraisers that raise money for the legal defense of individuals formally charged with violent crimes, including murder. This policy, codified in Section 8.10, bars campaigns intended to support the legal defense of financial or violent crimes such as murder, robbery, assault, battery, sex crimes, or crimes against minors.
The platform enforces this rule by removing violating campaigns and refunding all donations to donors. GoFundMe has applied this policy in various high-profile cases, such as shutting down a fundraiser for Kian Neal, a Tennessee teen accused of murder, citing that the site does not allow fundraisers involving alleged violent crimes even if the case is ongoing.
However, enforcement has faced criticism for being uneven or selective. For instance, a fundraiser for ICE agent Jonathan Ross, who fatally shot Renee Good, remained active despite public accusations that it violated the same rule, as Ross had not yet been formally charged at the time of the controversy. Critics argue this suggests the platform may apply its terms based on political pressure or the specific status of charges rather than consistent application of its stated safety guidelines.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Only one hero among them! Astounding!
That's $1M per murder. Clancy's making out better than most professional hitmen.
Clancy has become a ‘heroine’ to lots of women (and probably some men) who see her as a victim - though the three beautiful children are hardly mentioned. There are those who actually state that her husband killed the children and then convinced her that she did it. Seriously. This, after she sent him out shopping, and tracked his whereabouts while she was home killing her children.
To me, this case should have been all about whether postpartum depression can manifest as or develop into a full-blown psychosis, and whether she actually was transiently psychotic (or if she still is to some extent). There are a lot of people in the world who are suffering from depression, and if that alone was excuse enough to kill - we'd be in big trouble,
I hadn’t been following the case.
Is it true that 11/12 people think that a mother who murders her own kids is somehow innocent of the crime for some reason?
Do they think this should be legal?
If so, we are truly lost. This is the very definition of evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.