Posted on 09/04/2026 11:06:44 AM PDT by Retain Mike
Multiple Asian governments assert sovereignty over rocks, reefs, and other geographic features in the heavily trafficked South China Sea (SCS), with the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) arguably making the most assertive claims. Separate from the sovereignty disputes, the governments of the United States, China, and other countries disagree over what rights international law grants foreign militaries to fly, sail, and operate in a country’s territorial sea or exclusive economic zone (EEZ). For more than a decade, some Members have examined China’s efforts to use coercion and intimidation to increase its control over the SCS.
An estimated one-fifth to one-third of global ship-borne commerce transits the SCS each year, and U.S. allies and partners like Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, and Taiwan are dependent on its waterways for trade. According to estimates cited by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the SCS contains “proved” or “probable” reserves of approximately 3.6 billion barrels of oil and 40.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. The SCS has significant fish stocks, coral, and other undersea resources.
The PRC and the other SCS claimants (except Taiwan, which is not a member of the United Nations) are parties to the 1994 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The United States is not a party but has long had a policy of abiding by UNCLOS provisions relating to territorial waters, EEZs, and navigational rights. UNCLOS allows state parties to claim 12-nautical mile (nm) territorial seas and 200-nm EEZs around their coastlines and “naturally formed” land features that can “sustain human habitation.” Naturally formed land features that remain above water at high tide, but which are not habitable, are entitled to territorial seas, but they are not entitled to EEZs.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.usni.org ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
The problem is the name.
It should be the Sea of Vietnam.
I thought that while we’re performing semantic miracles we could bring peace to the “The South Asiatic Sea”.
We’re the only ones who don’t have a dog in that fight and the biggest dog is asserting itself. Can’t see a solution as some of those countries have to put their interests aside to deal with that big dog-not good. The P.I. has the little one as their corruption problems keep them from moving forward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.