Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 06/26/2026 7:39:27 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Andrew and Tristan Tate have lost a legal bid to be told the names of their UK accusers, which the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have withheld to remove the risk they could be made public.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
This sounds like my work.
That is wrong. They should be told who accused them.
Police “Sir, we’re here to charge you with a crime and take you in for questioning”
Alleged criminal, “what is the crime?”
Police “we cannot tell you”
Alleged criminal “well, who is the victim?”
Police “we cannot tell you”
Alleged criminal, “So if I understand you correctly, you are here to take me in because I may have done something to someone?”
Police “Exactly! Now come along…..”
They know how The Crown operates.
The Court of Star Chamber lives!
How do you possibly build a defense? Sounds like a Trump case: the “victim” can’t supply a date or timeframe, so you have no way to prove you have an alibi.
“It’s a fair cop.”
America: England.v.3.0
Not sure UK laws. But apparently Andrew Tate raped a 15 year old girl on camera so her name is protected.
They have to stand trial in romania before being extradited to the UK:
“he brothers face ongoing trials in Romania for allegations including human trafficking and sexual exploitation. “
Lock them up.
Good grief! Franz Kafka died over s century ago, but he sure seems to ba alive in merry old England.
“It’s not a coincidence that the Founding Fathers understood how critical it is to have the right to face your accuser.”
We have red flag laws.
I think it has spread further then just England.
Hiding women in sexual assault cases is simply wrong
We do it here to a degree as well
I know it will shock you by today’s post #metoo sensibilities but some places even in the west 13 is still age of consent
I have no knowledge of his alleged crime you speak of so I’m not saying 13 is the law there
If true it may come down to did her know
(Or not)
I find Tate Fuentes like absurd who occasionally says something reasonable
Is that what we’ve called
The more promiscuous and slutty women have become at the same time its exponentially easier to be a victim as a woman of sexual malfeasance
Yet the UK hasn’t really done jackpoha over the rape gang epidemic which is just mind numbing awful
To me it is major major scandal there.
I guess racial indentity politics trumps sexual assault and gang rape politics
These girls got no help and were even ganged raped and sodomized by cops and others who should have been protecting them
Sadly Britain does not have a constitution.
Presumably, under the law, they only need to be identified at the start of the trial. The fear seems to be that the accuser(s) might be approached and “convinced” to withdraw the charges but couldn’t they do that after the trial starts?
BTW, The Tates are scum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.