Unless they've come up with a viable way to make babies without men and are marketing it now, yes.
Yes, a declining number are, but you're ignoring or oblivious to the trend of falling birthrates and the increase in the number of single and childless women - the reason the opinion piece was written in the first place.
That may be true, but the percentage of babies born out of wedlock is now at 40%.
As for the "activism", men don't protest the way women do. They've chosen to walk away, and in increasing numbers. Because the know the only winning move is not to play.
If men are winning, then why are you still posting comments about all of the bias men face? You're the one who's contradicting yourself.
And yes, the porn usage is a poor substitute for actual interaction activism.
FIFY
Yet you claim it's not because, as a woman, you insist on telling men what they think. (That's part of the problem, you know.)
You don't need to be a woman to know how ready men are to sell out for the promise, no matter how slight, of getting some. It's most men who can't see what's happening, although some can.
And the birthrate still declines, showing that "solution" isn't working.
If men are winning, then why are you still posting comments about all of the bias men face?
I don't share my thoughts because I think it will change the minds of people who think differently. I share my thoughts to show the people who think like me that they're not alone. In this case in particular, Bettina Arndt who wrote the piece for 'The Daily Sceptic' is promoting falsehoods as to the cause of why men are opting out.
You don't need to be a woman to know how ready men are to sell out for the promise, no matter how slight, of getting some.
Apparently less ready, hence the article. Hence the trend over the last few decades.
Men are increasingly choosing pornography because "the promise, no matter how slight, of getting some" isn't even worth more than $3.99 per month to OnlyFans.