But how well can it do it? I still see a lot of errors.
As referenced in a Star Trek movie, the workers losing their jobs to machines once threw their wooden shoes, the sabots, into the mechanisms and coined the word “sabotage.” French word “saboter” for “bungle, botch, wreck or sabotage”.
Today the energy glutton AI would have to be starved of power by someone.
I’m just talking. No plans. Just chin music.
I calculated it could already do 11.8% of U.S. work. MIT is wrong. Or, as the editors of Ergo would have said, they're lying.
If true, 11.7% is not that significant (at this point)
Just wait until AI can design itself. And when it can design robots to repair anything. Including other robots.
| I don't buy into new technology "buzzwords" because they have been part of the computing/communications hype. Why do we capitalize the world "Internet", but not capitalize "telecom network"? They are more less the same thing. "AI" is merely a continuation of the same trend to draw knowledge from global networks and internet user patterns monitored by tech giants. There's no doubt: advanced comms/computer technology has vastly changed the economies of 1st world countries, as workers are forced to migrate to more useful work, considering the jobs that are no longer needed due to automation. The future will bring more change and realignment. |