Posted on 11/11/2025 10:04:12 PM PST by Morgana
Feminists should be happy. They say there isn’t a wrong reason for any abortion.
Eventually even the most cement-headed of them will figure this out.
When they do, expect abortions of males to be made mandatory.
I’ll never understand that.
They already know this.
They understand slippery-slope. They cannot be against any reason a woman has because if there is one accepted reason, others will make the case for other reasons, then abortion becomes restricted and womens desires could be overriden.
They are being extremely consistent. They know they have to be.
See post 5
I am afraid the unattached males will end up at war with each other. Cannon fodder.
Oh, abortions of girls will continue at the same pace, never fear...
“We understand you’re pregnant with a boy. We’re sorry, but we MUST have 49.9 % of all abortions to be boys and we’re running behind, so you’re going to have to come with us...”
>> Only Has 920 Girls for Every 1,000 Boys
What could go wrong!!??!?
(Hint: research China.)
Abortion is a violation of God’s commandment, “Thou shall not kill”; for those who understand God’s law. For those with a more naturalistic view, it ignores Mother Nature that sets forth the natural order of man’s procreation. Both set limits that insures man’s survival. The consequence of man’s disobedience is a harsh task master.
No, that would be them violating her rights to choose. That scenario will not happen by them. Most women who do this have no idea what sex the child is, so it could be that the women getting rid of females might actually make it closer to 50/50 if for example more male babies are actually killed or spontaneously abort.
Of course, that doesn't bode well for Black Men's pursuits of those female specimens.
People ignore this fact in many societies,
Sons support the parents in their old age.
Daughters get married and leave the home for
their new family thus cannot provide for
her birth parents. Thus sons are more valuable
to a family.
It costs time and money to raise kids
in all societies.
Who represents the best investment to
parents, in those societies without an
independent safety net for old people?
I can easily imagine a law passed - in certain states - making this possible, the right to carry to term be damned, quotas must be enforced.
I don’t see it. They would be no better than those they hate for affecting/preventing/denying womens “right to choose”, something they hold as the most sacred choice women have. They won’t do that.
Plus America isn’t India. There is no widespread abortion going on here for sex selection reasons. So theres no need to force anything you’re sayimg because it isn’t happening.
War on boys again...
One female can get pregnant and produce one offspring at a time (typically), and there's a recovery period after delivery. OTOH, one male can impregnate an unlimited number of women, at pretty much any time.
For a moment, ignore monogamy, morality, etc. Think "caveman mode" for a moment, and realize that humans spent tens of thousands of years in "caveman mode" before civilization and religion and society developed monogamy. Our genes are still pretty much in caveman mode.
In that mode, a single male can keep ten females pregnant most of the time.
So from a population growth point of view, men could be 10% of the population and the population would still grow just fine. In caveman mode.
Aborting your female babies is how you do population control. India is, consciously or not, limiting their population growth.
What about "excess" males? That's what war is for. In caveman mode, at least.
Civilization is a recent, fragile, thin-thin veneer over caveman mode.
“They would be no better than those they hate for affecting/preventing/denying womens “right to choose”, something they hold as the most sacred choice women have. They won’t do that.”
We may be talking about two types here - the “classic feminist,” the Gloria Steinems and Betty Friedans would agree with you.
Friedan’s dead and Steinem is in her 90s.
The purple-haired harpies I’m thinking of are FINOs; they’re Marxists first and always.
Again, there would be no push for this here because women dont get abortions here for sex selection reasons. You’re not listening, youre just fixated that it will somehow come here. Theres a clear reason why it happens in India and China. We do not have that reason here so its not happening here, and it won’t play out that way here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.