Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Malevolent Brilliance of Candace Owens
National Review ^ | 11/11/25 | Rich Lowery

Posted on 11/11/2025 11:16:06 AM PST by DallasBiff

click here to read article


Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Rich Lowery's take, I do think she and Tucker are off their rails.

Discuss.

1 posted on 11/11/2025 11:16:06 AM PST by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I want to see what happens with the Macron lawsuit.

Grab the popcorn.


2 posted on 11/11/2025 11:17:18 AM PST by cgbg ("The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

NR went off the deep end before Candace and Tucker.


3 posted on 11/11/2025 11:18:25 AM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
This clown (Owens) seriously expects the police to “do a thorough investigation” of the Kirk shooting after the perp has already been apprehended and charged. Is she working as the defendant’s lawyer? WTF? LOL.
4 posted on 11/11/2025 11:21:41 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I used to follow National Review before it turned into outright neocon/deep-state BS

Kinda same with Candace Owens. I don’t have time to follow her theories, or constant feeding and analysis of who is conservative heretic and who is not. Same with Ben Shapiro.

But if our ship sank and my lifeboat could only hold either Candace Owens or Rich Lowery, the fact he and National Review are attacking her, I’d probably pull Candace Owens out of the water.


5 posted on 11/11/2025 11:25:58 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

She’d probably kick you in the butt and boot you overboard for thanks.


6 posted on 11/11/2025 11:30:26 AM PST by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

National Review? Can't get much more "deep state" on the RINO side than that. If the NR is that invested in discrediting Candace Owens' ... well ... she might well be over the target and taking flak. She and Charlie were very good friends. I trust her to honor Charlie's memory. Being honest with myself, she is exactly the redblooded patriotic type of firebrand I want watching out for me too.


7 posted on 11/11/2025 11:31:36 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Today, the podcast, Chicks On The Right, had a long segment showing how Candace lies so much. They showed an interview where she lied her butt off, then screenshots of texts or emails proving how bad she is.


8 posted on 11/11/2025 11:34:49 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Candice is an anti-Semite crackpot. She may have been friends with Charlie but she is doing his memory no favors with her crackpot theories on why he was killed.


9 posted on 11/11/2025 11:37:14 AM PST by packrat35 (“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

I liked Candace when she first became known. She was feisty and had spunk. It turns out Lou Grant was right in her case.


10 posted on 11/11/2025 11:43:01 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
--- "Discuss."

Perhaps I'm an 'odd man out,' but I don't watch any of the stuff any of these talking heads peddle.

But I sure miss Mither Limbaugh....

11 posted on 11/11/2025 11:45:52 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“...after the perp has already been apprehended and charged.”

It just so happens that the perp apprehended and charged may not have been the assassin.

You know anything about that rifle slug thas supposedly hit Kirk. The attendant doctor said there was no exit wound. That won’t square with a 30.06 caliber. It leaves craters.


12 posted on 11/11/2025 11:49:22 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Right. “You have spunk. I hate spunk.” Classic TV. Chuckles’ funeral was the best.


13 posted on 11/11/2025 11:50:24 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Remember when Candace dox’ed people on here website in 2016?

Fast talking but somewhere she’s gone into delusion-land.


14 posted on 11/11/2025 11:51:19 AM PST by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: so_real

“g honest with myself, she is exactly the redblooded patriotic type of firebrand I want watching out for me too.”

Yeah, the way she is betraying her “friend” Charlie Kirk by spreading doubts about his killer in order to self-promote is real friendship and loyalty.

She’s a user.


15 posted on 11/11/2025 11:54:18 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Hopefully malevolent is a 10 letter word for stupid


16 posted on 11/11/2025 11:55:06 AM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
There's too much of this idea that if we disagree with a particular person or source on one issue, that makes everyone else they say worthless as well. But the validity of an argument or position is independent of who came up with it -- Good/smart people sometimes say stupid/wrongheaded stuff, and bad/stupid people occasionally get some things right.

We should spend more time discussing the merits of what someone says rather than who says it.

With that in mind, Lowry has the better of this argument. On this particular issue, Owens is a whackjob.

17 posted on 11/11/2025 11:57:34 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Someone I know sent me some videos of these people even though he knows I don’t watch videos,and I don’t care to hear what other people think.

I had never heard of Kirk, but obviously the Jews did it.

I have heard of Tucker never watched he may be a smart guy, or just maybe gets smart payday?

I have watched TV preachers who just want my cash, but they look as phony as the above

I listened to Rush when I was a kid, I listened to Working Man, 2112 and Moving Pictures many times.

Soon we will have virtual A-heads who will be cheap and always on message. I think it eventually will become like WWF in parliament with the hosts having verbose smack-downs.

Look at the old Farange (pre trump) videos


18 posted on 11/11/2025 12:01:17 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: so_real

“She and Charlie were very good friends”

Oh yes, Charlie was friends with a nasty anti-semetic. Where are you getting your into? Wherever it is, run.


19 posted on 11/11/2025 12:03:54 PM PST by Pirate Ragnar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Ever been deer hunting? The media and "trusted government officials" are telling us Charlie was shot in the neck with a Mauser 98. That means it was chambered in one of 8mm Mauser, 7.92×57, .30-06, 7×57, or 6.5×55. I'll bet you my next year's income there is not a human neck on this planet that could catch any of those rounds without an exit wound, and a big one at that. Someone is flat out lying to us. Until we know who and why, Owens' theories are as good as anyone's and probably better than most. You can try to bury the story by calling her an anti-semite for questioning the authorities. But that carries about as much weight as calling her racist or sexist. I'd like to see what the autopsy says before throwing labels at people.


20 posted on 11/11/2025 12:04:59 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson