Still pretending it’s not a proxy war.
When will this stupidity end?
Boom goes London, Boom Parie, More room for you and more room for me. They all hate us anyhow, lets drop the big one now.
As we rapidly approach Armageddon, the Zeepers here all in for unlimited nuclear war. The other day one said that he/she didn't thing the Russian nukes would work anyway. Just because they have had the H-Bomb since November 22, 1955 and spend 24 hours of every day and who knows how many $Billions improving their arsenal does not mean anything to these clowns.

An excellent question and observation.
In exchanges about this and Secretary of State Marco Rubio's specific and verifiable quote that this has been a proxy war, some have argued some form of 1) well, he didn't really mean it, or 2) "Calling it a 'proxy war' is falling for Putin's propaganda."
As this thread is specifically about Kellogg's remarks as reported by Kyiv Independent via MSN, the question is all the more probing.
Another comment asks: "Just who's war is this anyways?" Just so.
For various Freepers who comment, the question is simple. Yet replies can be so evasive.
1) Is this a proxy war, and the US is allied with NATO in it?Shouldn't be too difficult to pick one with some clarity.2) Is this not a proxy war, as the US is distancing itself by supplying European nations with weapons for sale?
3) Is this actually an active war, with the United States allied with the whole of NATO and with non-NATO Ukraine against Russia?
My take is the second, as the days go by, while Kellogg is trying to keep it the first, as it was under Biden. And some few Freepers have gone as far as "Drop a nuke on him!"
Not anymore