Posted on 09/24/2025 5:22:09 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Bannon suggests what investigators might find if they look under the hood of Antifa, at financing, and support from military/intelligence personnel and the media:
STEVE BANNON: The New York Times has a huge article, I think it was on page one of the physical paper, about this whole issue of Jimmy Kimmel. Here's what is obvious.
They take the firing of Jimmy Kimmel, which is really an economic decision made by the affiliates who are just tired of it. They don't want the hate, knowing that they can lose 60% of their audience, and particularly the unacceptable remarks about Charlie Kirk. And he was prepared to make more of an attack on MAGA; they don't need that. This is why Hollywood movies are bombing. This is why so many of them know the cable; this is what they're spinning off MSNBC, right?
There's just no audience for that kind of overarching narrative of the globalist and the elitists. The country has collapsed. Why? They use that information, news in service to themselves, not to the country, and not just citizens of the country. American citizens are very smart and have tremendous common sense and kind of a basic core of American values. They have seen through it.
So they're so freaked out because they know that we're coming for them. We are coming for them. I said to the New York Times, I'm like, people after had 1000 people come to me, "Hey, can you come up and debate the free speech?" No, I'm not doing that, we're taking action now. We're cleaning house at these media companies.
And this is why the media companies are making all this nonsense about the Antifa investigation, "Antifa are just a bunch of kids running around." Yep. That's on the surface,
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
This is a war. It needs to be fought like a war.
RICO will be epic.
“Bannon: Look Under The Hood Of Antifa And You’ll Find George Soros, Tides Foundation, ActBlue”
That’s the simpleton answer.
There are primary domestic influences. Nay, strategists & leaders. Probably from within the government (still).
The headline: Those are merely useful idiots to muddy the $$ trail.
(working, it is)
He should know better, in addition re spreading propaganda about how/why kimmel was removed from the air. He ought to lay off the sauce.
ACME Coyote Fascists Inc.
Uh, what?
Why would they put Kimmel back on? Over 70 affiliates will not air that pos. That’s even more lost revenue.
Hitting the sauce, too?
bannon’s a broken clock. I have a theory about him, tucker & owens but I’m not getting into it here.
It is decidedly convenient that the 3 have literally gone off the rails, but every so often - e.g., ‘twice a day’ - they get something right.
He’s not right on this: Today - at least this half - he’s just another useful idiot. The problem is not soros, but he’s ‘half’ right citing tides/actblue.
The problem is HERE.
And yeah, he’s spreading propaganda on kimmel; look at his post at the link.
Hopefully Pam will issue a strongly worded letter.
Why hasn’t the FBI infiltrated this group yet? This should have been a priority from the first Trump administration.
Domestic terrorists.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing man he didn’t exist…
Probably a business decision. Do they want to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination or let him ride to the end of his contract and simply not renew? If they can him and he successfully sues they could lose a lot of money. If they put him back on, he continues to drain the coffers. But his contract is up in April, I think. At that point they can elect to not renew his contract and he has no legal recourse. The money drain stops then.
Even if Kimmel is reinstated, may everyone realize that he still will not be watched in many households.
Precisely. But we knew that, Sloppy Steve.
OK. We’ve been talking about this for about 7 or 8 years. Enough talk. Do it. Trump’s FBI and DOJ and maybe even the intelligence community need to do a deep dive into ANTIFA to find and prosecute its funding sources. Just saying Soros funds it is not enough. He’s smart enough to not fund direct violence. There are a chain of NGOs that provide plausible deniability. Someone government authority needs to trace it through and see if charges can be brought.
OK
I ain’t mad at ya, can’t even remember what I said.
Oh that’s right, I didn’t say anything.
And the Sierra Club. Donations to all of these are laundered through the Sierra Club.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.