Posted on 09/04/2025 12:03:06 PM PDT by Miami Rebel
Apparently the DOJ dude in interview isn’t on the Epstein case
He told her he was only repeating what he read in media
That he had no inside info
Good for you. Skepticism is healthy.
Now click on the handy links to the O’Keefe source material.
Two things can be true.
O’keefe’s recording of anJustoce Department official is accurate.
The person being recorded knows nothing, has no proof and is trying to be somebody.
That’s called “Clean up in Aisle Epstein.”
I didn’t hear any qualifications in Schnitt’s taped comments. Did you?
Yes it’s doubtful this guy has any inside information. He’s just expressing what most people have come to think after moving Maxwell to a more cozy prison.
...and just look at the excuses still being spewed by FR’s “Greatest” on why we havent seen a single arrest for any of the fraud uncovered early on...
All the noise we’ve heard, and to date not a single Swamp Creature is heading to prison. I have officially given up all hope. Trump, IMHO, is at 30% approval because of it.
I’m sure you’d be just as blasé about a disclosure like this had it come from a high official in Garland’s Justice Department.
I’m only blasé about it because I thought the same thing myself after they moved Maxwell. I’m sure most people thought something was up after Trump did that. Like I said this guy is just repeating what many of us were already thinking.
LOL!
O'Keefe is quoting hersay.
It's NOT whether Mediaite is credible. It's whether Joseph Schnitt is credible.
TDS'ers won't think this.
true or not, Joseph Schnitt needs to be fired toot sweet ...
Well they sure kept Epstein himself quiet.
O’Keefe elicited his comments and amplified them.
There is a disclaimer from DOJ with him explaining that the dude was repeating media
I don’t have the link
Sorry
But neither can I imagine the DOJ actually reacting all Repubs as if no one would notice
So there’s nothing there and he just said what his date wanted to hear gotcha
And no they are not his setups and stings are just getting a pretty girl to say what he thinks his date wants to hear.
The disclaimer is ex post facto, i.e., damage control.
ex post facto?? How could they have commented before they knew what OMG would say?
Do YOU really think the DOJ would blacken every Republican name in those pages?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.