None of that matters, we are discussing the ideology and the concept in general. Just as we would any other article from any other source. We are not discussing whether the source is credible or not. The title is not “How credible is Armstrong?”.
You are attempting to disrupt the continuity and any productive discussion about the ideology itself by shooting the messenger. It is an effort to destroy the thread because you do not agree with the narrative. So you want to make sure no one else discusses it either.
If you don’t like Armstrong and don’t like ANYTHING he shares you can always just not click on it. We don’t need you to come protect us from him. We are are already wary of ALL sources and only come to discuss the content alone.
“We are not discussing whether the source is credible or not.”
The source has proven over and over to not be credible.
His sole purpose in life is to drive suckers to his scam website and videos.
Your attempt to give him cred is contemptible.
“If you don’t like Armstrong and don’t like ANYTHING he shares you can always just not click on it. We don’t need you to come protect us from him.”
LOL!
I sure hit your sore spot. Just why does it irritate you so that I post facts about Armstrong?
The OP literally said this was accurate and had a history of accuracy. Now you claim it is somehow irrelevant to discuss the credibility of the source and pointing out the long history of complete inaccuracy?
That’s some logic - if you can just keep on dismissing each and every premises of a discussion as irrelevant, you can never be wrong.