Shove a few verbs up their ying yang. They’ll get over it.
I think I won’t play along with their insanity.
“I reiterated my concern when the Supreme Court issued Justice Gorsuch’s utterly misbegotten decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. That decision (extended) Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act...to sexual preference and so-called “gender identity.” Of course, by sex, Congress in 1964 clearly meant only the XX/XY binary. Homosexuality was not at issue, and “gender identity” had not yet been birthed in leftists’ fertile imaginations.”
Here’s the problem with the latest (young) Justices - Does Gorsuch even know that back in 1964 gay/trans stuff was safely tucked away, out of sight, and out of mention in Congress, when the bill passed?
I suspect he doesn’t know it, given his decision to expand the law, which, OBVIOUSLY, could have been done through an act of Congress instead. And I doubt the people who argued the case on our side even bothered to mention this little fact (regarding 1964 society) to Gorsuch, assuming he already knew it. But why would he know it, when INUNDATED by gay/trans crap all his life?
The marriage between a man and a woman is ordained by God. A marriage between two kweers is a government matter. Government is more than willing to accept the increased tax revenue caused by the civil marriage and known as the marriage penalty.