Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 06/24/2025 6:48:58 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
The #NeverTrump movement just got another backer. Conservative radio host Mark Levin threatened on Friday that he will not support Donald Trump in the general election, should he be the nominee.
Levin, a strong supporter of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, said that Trump’s allies had made the billionaire Republican front-runner toxic.
…“If they piss me off one more time, I’m going to urge millions and millions of you, should he get the nomination, not to vote for him either,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
From what I can tell, Levin seems to be a very bright person. However, his performative commentary is exhausting. Levin is usually angry, ranting about this or that while offering zero in terms of remedy. I don’t pay attention to him anymore.
It’s interesting to go back and see what people said years ago.
In 2016, many people on Free Republic did not support Trump for the nomination. Now just about everyone here loves Trump. People’s opinions change based on events which happen.
why is politico living in the past ?
weird.
maybe i missed something, but i value there opinion just south of zero so i wont bother to read the rest of their story.
.
And J.D. Vance called Trump “America’s Hitler” in 2016. So what?
politico aka politibullshit
But I held my nose and voted for him, and was then pleasantly surprised when I found out he actually meant what he said, and thus earned my trust and support.
<< why is politico living in the past ? >>
Article is from 2016
“why is politico living in the past ?”
They aren’t
A Freeper chose to post a nine year old article
“”” Levin is usually angry, ranting about this or that “”
I can’t watch him. He always acts like his head is on fire. Much like Stephen A Smith in the sports world. CLOWNS
Thanks for posting. Levin is SUPPOSED to be our in-house “Constitutional Scholar”, yet he was willing to support Skunk Cabbage in the 2016 election (and didn’t change from that position for months, until his ratings came in).
I suspect pretty much everyone here had worries about Trump in 2016 and I had some. BUT we all knew what Skunk Cabbage was going to do the country if she won, so, like most Republicans, it was an easy choice.
For Levin, the best that I can come up with is that Trump played HARD BALL against Cruz, and Levin couldn’t forgive Trump for that...to the point of damning the country to be another South Africa (at least until his ratings came in).
Sorry, but I hold “Constitutional Scholars” to at least my level, and Levin isn’t even close (I had no problem deciding) - so he can go to hell as far as I’m concerned.
but once trump attained power, despite the neoCONs doing everything they could to stop him, the evil neoCONs couldn’t wait to worm their way into his administration.
As far as I know Mark Levin has been pro-Trump since 2018.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-June 24 2025
-
Fox News’ Mark Levin minced no words in his latest denunciation of his ex-colleague Tucker Carlson, deeming him “the Happy Hooker of politics” in a long post on X.
Levin and Carlson have been engaged in a protracted war of words over the last month and change, mostly over the debate over whether the United States should strike the Iranian nuclear program, which President Donald Trump eventually decided to do — to Levin’s delight and Carlson’s chagrin — over the weekend.
After Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, Carlson wrote the following in a post promoting the latest episode of his show: “Thank God Trump brokered a ceasefire. That’s the last thing Mark Levin wanted.”
Levin responded with fire and fury on Tuesday morning.
“What’s left to say about Chatsworth Qatarlson [Carlson] that he hasn’t already said about himself. He has had more positions on Iran and Israel than you can count — the Happy Hooker of politics — but has wound up supporting a terrorist regime that has murdered and maimed thousands of Americans. His preposterously hysterical warnings about what would happen if the president acted militarily against Iran’s nuclear sites were illustrative of his unhinged bravado,” began Levin.
“He uses his platform to promote antisemitism, former KGB colonel and mass murderer Putin, the Qatar terror regime that was behind 9/11, trash Winston Churchill — one of the world’s greatest defenders of democracy against one of the world’s greatest mass murders Adolph [sic] Hitler, rewrite American history to condemn America, and the long list goes on. It’s all public. He’s very proud of his depraved insanity. Qatarlson has been a liberal, a libertarian, an actual neo-con, a conservative, and today just a simple reprobate who has much in common with Bernie Sanders and Rashida Tliab [sic].”
He’s having a meltdown in X right now.
This is wearisome. Levin has supported Prs. Trump fully since Sept. 2016. Fully.
Also don’t forget how that POS Shapiro “calculated” that it would be better for conservatives to let Hillary win than to elect Trump.
But now the neoCON scum want you to think they are the true conservatives.
“In 2016, many people on Free Republic did not support Trump for the nomination”
I was one of them; I supported Ted Cruz. In large part, I did not jump on the Trump bandwagon during the primary because I did not know how he would actually govern if elected. His prior statements, particularly on prolife issues were inconsistent.
I supported him in the general election and, as you say, have strongly supported him since.
So what? Are voters not pure enough if they were not with Trump in the escalator beginning?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.