In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Former 33rd Degree Mason Reveals the Darkest Secrets of Freemasonry, Jamestown1630 wrote: Oh, yes - if one doesn't agree with you, they must be 'one of them', right?
Typical of a major denizen of our FR 'Q' cult.I know of no one who vigorously defends Masons with alternate interpretations of the symbology without some kind of connection to Masons. Note that person took my opinion and stated I was evil and a slanderer, so I had no fear they would be sensitive to my remarks in reply.
Note that I said good Samaritans make up the bulk of the pyramid - I did not imply that person was evil, but I know membership requires that oath.
You don’t KNOW much at all.
You believe things you’ve heard.
“ know of no one who vigorously defends Masons with alternate interpretations of the symbology without some kind of connection to Masons”
That’s a bit like saying no one who vigorously defends Chevy pickups who doesn’t own a Chevy pickup or used to own one or whatnot.
Of course, people who care about defending any given subject are generally interested or related to the subject matter in some way.
You really are an evil, misguided, person and a poor witness for Christ.