The person who was not there.
O-kay. That is a dumb concept.
I don't buy the excuse that with women who kill their kids that some man is responsible and I do not buy that with men who kill their kids that some woman was responsible.
Because I am fond of logic.
Who ever did it, owns it.
“Because I am fond of logic.”
Your logic is misplaced.
She *KNEW* he was ROUTINELY leaving the children in the car and playing video games.
Therefore, she was at the least an enabler.
Logic dictates (going to leave a bad taste in your mouth) that THIS time he ran out of luck and a child died.
She was also gambling that it wouldn’t happen.
If she didn’t know it was happening it would be different.
They found texts where she KNEW it was happening.
The FIRST time it happened she should have called the cops to file against him. That would have 1) got it on record and him out of the home, or 2) got it on record and he was then going to be monitored.
She did not defend her children in the appropriate manner.
Why? Don’t know. Doesn’t matter.
The child died.
It’s only the LORD God’s grace it was only one child and not all of them.
It’s still an horrendous death.
“Whoever did it owns it.”
_________________________________
She *KNEW* he was ROUTINELY leaving the children in the car and playing video games.
Therefore, she was at the least an enabler.
As a **mother** (going to leave a bad taste in your mouth)she was also gambling that it wouldn’t happen.
If she didn’t know it was happening it would be different.
They found texts where she KNEW it was happening.
The FIRST time it happened she should have called the cops to file against him. That would have 1) got it on record and him out of the home, or 2) got it on record and he was then going to be monitored.
She did not defend her children in the appropriate manner.
Why? Don’t know. Doesn’t matter.
The child died.
It’s only the LORD God’s grace it was only one child and not all of them.
It’s still an horrendous death.