This jackazz from Slate is saying that she misinterpreted a 1966 statute that supposedly allows an AG to appoint a Special Prosecutor, while completely ignoring the fact that the Constitution and her ruling would have invalidated that law as well,since that law is in violation of the appointments clause.
1966? Seems like she’s making stuff up.
There is no longer US Code authorizing special counsels. The DOJ just made some stuff up as noted in Code of Federal Regulations, which aren’t laws. Anyone really interested can read the report of the Congressional Research Service, especially all the way to the end.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R44857
1966? Seems like she’s making stuff up.
There is no longer US Code authorizing special counsels. The DOJ just made some stuff up as noted in Code of Federal Regulations, which aren’t laws. Anyone really interested can read the report of the Congressional Research Service, especially all the way to the end.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R44857