Audio Analysis is Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People

Peak Prosperity ^ | 07/18/2025 | Chris Martenson

[Jan_Sobieski]

Audio Analysis is 100% Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People (Shooters) at different distances and possibly different caliber bullets…

[Jan_Sobieski]

Great audio analysis!

[DHerion]

Ballistics would prove that...right? They have the bullets.

[libh8er]

With cameras everywhere there has to be a video of it if true.

[rktman]

.223 from the assclown. Likely .308 or .338 Lapua or some such from the guy that took him out.

[janetjanet998]

Rumble version of his channel to avoid google products
https://rumble.com/v57hp8j-audio-analysis-is-100-clear-trump-and-crowd-were-shot-at-by-two-separate-pe.html

Some claiming the cameras were moving which caused the difference

[Carriage Hill]

Was the long-distance shot from nearby Meriden?

[madison10]

God protected Trump more than once. President Trump could have been shot again when he stood up.

[nitzy]

There were 2 sets of security teams firing at the assassin from 2 different locations.

[slumber1]

Two shooters and they both missed?

[chuckb87]

“Two shooters and they both missed?”

They’re democrats.

[sauropod]

.

[LIConFem]

I saw that video a couple of hours ago. Got into the weeds a bit, but a good analysis nonetheless. The two things I think he got wrong were claiming that Trump was hit with the first shot. The video shows Trump grabbing his ear after the third(?) shot. He also claims that that same bullet hit and injured the man at the top left of the stands (from Trumps point of view). I didn't get that sense watching the video.

In any case, glad there are some intelligent people outside the gov't who are doing some serious analysis. I still doubt we'll ever know exactly what happened and who all might have been involved.

[LastDayz]

Who knows.... shades of JFK.... did Trump take one to the vest as I’d read a blurb somewhere about that.

[rktman]

They won’t say it publicly (most of them) but first time they were glad there was an AR around but sad that it didn’t do the job. You know most of them are thinking it.

[Jane Long]

They have the bullets.

---

Yes, *they* do.

Therein lies the rub.

[janetjanet998]

I followed this channel in the early days of Covid

He was pushing the lab leak theory from day one and explained why

[dforest]

But aren’t they saying that Trump was shot by one type and the crown another? The assassin who shot Crooks would be a third type?

[rhinohunter]

They have the bullets.

And that right there is the problem isn’t it?

And it’s why we’ll never know….

[Jane Long]

The two things I think he got wrong were claiming that Trump was hit with the first shot.

---

Maybe the first shot of the additional shooter?

Is the guy who was hit with the ‘same bullet’, as Pres Trump’s ear, within the trajectory?

I have not watched this vid, just honestly curious/asking/wondering.

[Republican Wildcat]

Some claiming the cameras were moving which caused the difference

That would indeed cause a difference in the audio both directionally and the sound - in addition to any shots that were fired against the assassin.

Just more nonsense from people who don't know what they are talking about (assuming the best about them). The same people who posted that mini robots are now controlling the bodies of people who took the vaccines, that 5g is engaging in mind control, bombs were posted on the bridge that collapsed after being struck by the barge (which happened by coincidence to all explode in perfect pattern and timing with the wave of energy from the barge's point of impact), etc. The more nonsensical, the better.