Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is AOC Married? Her Office Says No. Her Legal Filings in Congress Say Otherwise.
Free Beacon ^ | September 13, 2023 | Andrew Kerr

Posted on 09/13/2023 5:50:39 PM PDT by grundle

The contradiction may pose problems for the left-wing lawmaker, who has not disclosed her fiancé’s finances

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D., N.Y.) office says she isn’t married. But she has described her fiancé, Riley Roberts, as her "spouse" in forms filed with the House Ethics Committee in 2023, which has a strict definition of that term—"someone to whom you are legally married."

That could become a problem for the left-wing darling, since willful misrepresentations on the documents are a no-no—they could subject her to criminal prosecution, the forms state—and members of Congress are required to disclose the financial information of their spouses, which Ocasio-Cortez has declined to do.

But taken at face value, four legal filings submitted to the House Ethics Committee pertaining to AOC’s overseas travels in 2022 and 2023 suggest the pair have been legally married at least since Jan. 13, 2023. If that is the case, the "Squad" member can no longer leverage the so-called boyfriend loophole to evade public disclosure of his finances. While lawmakers are required to disclose financial information about their spouses, live-in romantic partners and fiancés are exempt from the rule.

If they are not, her forms were filed incorrectly. "They are not legally married," AOC spokeswoman Lauren Hitt told the Washington Free Beacon. "House Ethics has commonly recognized the term spouse to extend to long-term partners."

Hitt’s statement is false. The House Ethics Committee, which has sole jurisdiction over the Code of Official Conduct that governs the acts of members of the House, defines a spouse as "someone to whom you are legally married." Ocasio-Cortez had the option to describe Roberts as her fiancé in the forms to the committee, but instead, checked boxes representing him as her "spouse."

The House Ethics Committee declined to comment.

Ocasio-Cortez did not disclose any of Roberts’s reportable stock holdings, assets, liabilities, or income on her latest financial disclosure submitted in August, though she did make two references to her "spouse" in the filing.

It’s unclear why Ocasio-Cortez considers Roberts her spouse for the purposes of overseas travel but not when it comes to financial disclosure. It’s also unclear why Ocasio-Cortez never identified Roberts as her spouse in ethics disclosures prior to 2023, even though, according to her office, the legal status of their relationship has remained unchanged since she joined Congress in 2019.

It’s possible that Hitt was referring to the Office of Congressional Ethics, which considers long-term romantic partners of lawmakers to be "synonymous with a spouse." But the Office of Congressional Ethics is effectively subservient to the House Ethics Committee. As an independent entity, the Office of Congressional Ethics cannot make legally binding enforcement decisions against lawmakers; it simply makes enforcement recommendations to the Ethics Committee.

Regardless, Ocasio-Cortez has opened herself up to charges of hypocrisy, said Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, the senior government affairs manager at the Project on Government Oversight. Hedtler-Gaudette called on the New York Democrat to "put her money where her mouth is" and disclose her household finances to the public.

"If Rep. Ocasio-Cortez is going to refer to Mr. Roberts as her spouse in the context of one kind of ethics disclosure, it would be logical and consistent for her to do so in the context of all ethics disclosures, including annual financial disclosures and periodic transaction reports," Hedtler-Gaudette told the Free Beacon.

Roberts, a web developer and growth consultant, has been a quiet fixture in Ocasio-Cortez’s life throughout her tenure on the Hill. The left-wing lawmaker announced her engagement to Roberts in May 2022 and has since said little about her wedding plans. She told Insider that she and Roberts were "taking some space to savor" their engagement before tying the knot.

The confusion surrounding Ocasio-Cortez’s finances comes as she has established herself as a champion of ethics and transparency in government. She introduced legislation in April that would ban members of Congress and their spouses from owning stocks.

Ocasio-Cortez has also attacked Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas for his supposed ethical transgressions. The "Squad" member led an effort in August calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to launch a federal investigation into the conservative justice’s "blatant disregard for judicial ethics" for "failing to report significant gifts he received from Harlan Crow and other billionaires."

The lawmaker has boasted that she does not hold stocks or cryptocurrencies so she can do her job "as ethically and impartially as I can." It is not clear if Roberts owns or trades stocks or crypto, however. Nor is it clear if Ocasio-Cortez intends to revise her ethics disclosures to reflect Roberts’s finances. Ocasio-Cortez’s office did not answer a series of follow-up questions from the Free Beacon.

If Ocasio-Cortez is indeed married to Roberts, she may have created other legal issues for herself, legal experts told the Free Beacon.

"If they were married then she would be required to disclose his finances on her 2022 financial disclosure," said Kendra Arnold, executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust. "There is no exception to this rule."

Willful misrepresentations in congressional financial disclosure forms could result in civil penalties of up to $50,000, or, in extreme cases, imprisonment of up to five years, according to the House Ethics Committee. Ocasio-Cortez could also be reprimanded by the committee or be censured by a majority vote of the House if she intentionally concealed her husband’s finances from the public, said Paul Kamenar, an attorney for the National Legal and Policy Center.

Ocasio-Cortez first identified Roberts as her "spouse" when she requested authorization from the House Ethics Committee on January 13 for the pair to accept sponsored travel to Japan and South Korea the following month. Upon her return, Ocasio-Cortez again identified Roberts as her "spouse" in a signed disclosure to the committee dated March 13.

The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, which sponsored the trip, told the Free Beacon that Roberts accompanied Ocasio-Cortez to Japan and South Korea at his own expense.

Ocasio-Cortez again referred to Roberts as her "spouse" in a gift travel disclosure form submitted in September detailing her August travels to South America. Ocasio-Cortez said Roberts accompanied her on the trip, which was funded by George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society.

The primary sponsor of that trip, the Center for Economic and Policy Research, confirmed to the Free Beacon that Roberts accompanied Ocasio-Cortez on her trip to South America on his own dime.

Ocasio-Cortez also made two references to her "spouse" in her 2022 financial disclosure. Ocasio-Cortez reported that she paid for their flight expenses to Venice, Italy, for a week-long vacation in August that year. During that trip, the pair appears to have attended a four-day art conference sponsored by the Los Angeles-based Mara Foundation, an obscure Los Angeles-based charity that awards prizes to artists, according to records obtained by the Free Beacon.

Mara Foundation CEO Kour Pour did not return a request for comment.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anotheraocthread; aoc; laurenhitt; lyinglaurenhitt; newyork; newyorkcity; rileyroberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
The article includes links to these sources. Note the use of the word "spouse" in each one.

https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/gtimages/MT/2023/500026961.pdf

https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/gtimages/MT/2023/500025932.pdf

https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2022/10052480.pdf

1 posted on 09/13/2023 5:50:39 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle
I thought she was married to some ginger Prince Andrew lookalike.

2 posted on 09/13/2023 5:52:37 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie
I thought she was married to some ginger Prince Andrew Harry lookalike.
3 posted on 09/13/2023 5:54:02 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

All I know is she belongs in my kitchen making sammiches.


4 posted on 09/13/2023 5:57:12 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

No that the Somali rep


5 posted on 09/13/2023 5:58:28 PM PDT by McGavin999 ( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore………)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Uh, oh! Congress’ very own Betty Boop has gone and boop-oop-a-dooped up!


6 posted on 09/13/2023 5:59:03 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Cut her some slack, she’s not very bright.


7 posted on 09/13/2023 6:00:47 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

I would never marry AOC. Those big teeth scare me. If I make her mad, there goes my manhood 😂


8 posted on 09/13/2023 6:03:27 PM PDT by entropy12 (Career politicians like Desantis build wealth. Trump sacrificed his wealth to serve people. GO TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

10% to the side guy.


9 posted on 09/13/2023 6:05:50 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It all depends on what the definition of spouse is.

and since she is A.O.C. words like that can be defined on the fly


10 posted on 09/13/2023 6:09:45 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“House Ethics has commonly recognized the term spouse to extend to long-term partners.”


Who defines and what is “long-term”?


11 posted on 09/13/2023 6:11:25 PM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Doris Day hit song in 1953

Secret Love

Once I had a secret love
That lived within the heart of me
All too soon my secret love
Became impatient to be free

So I told a friendly star
The way that dreamers often do
Just how wonderful you are
And why I’m so in love with you

Now I shout it from the highest hills
Even told the golden daffodils
At last my heart’s an open door
And my secret love’s no secret anymore


12 posted on 09/13/2023 6:14:18 PM PDT by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

She is using the standard Democrat double standard - her only standard.


13 posted on 09/13/2023 6:14:32 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“That could become a problem for the left-wing darling, since willful misrepresentations on the documents are a no-no—they could subject her to criminal prosecution, the forms state—and members of Congress are required to disclose the financial information of their spouses, which Ocasio-Cortez has declined to do.”

Right. I’m sure Merrick Garland will get right on that. She’ll probably do 20 years.


14 posted on 09/13/2023 6:16:09 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Right you are!


15 posted on 09/13/2023 6:17:34 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Lying is what they do.


16 posted on 09/13/2023 6:20:37 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Wait a moment,,,I thought she was gay.....Ocasio-Cortez


17 posted on 09/13/2023 6:22:33 PM PDT by Osage Orange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: algore

RE: that can be defined on the fly

We assume his fly remained zipped and they acted as brother and sister until religiously and civilly sanctioned matrimony.✝️🕯️📖🌷🌺🕊️🕊️


18 posted on 09/13/2023 6:24:03 PM PDT by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I kind of doubt she is married. She seems like the Bridezilla type. She adores all the attention and I can’t see her passing all that up for a JP style wedding.


19 posted on 09/13/2023 6:27:05 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Anything about a democRAT and the term ‘legal’ should be taken with a large skyscraper of salt. There are no rules, regulations, or laws that apply to democRATS. Ocrazio could claim 40 dependants on her tax return. They would process the return as is.


20 posted on 09/13/2023 6:50:01 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson