[SkyDancer]

It's because I've played in this circus here every time it's brought up. It's getting old and wearisome. Both Boeing and the NTSB agreed it was the worn center fuel tank that leaked fuel and was ignited far back and ran up to the plane and exploded the tank. If it was a rocket, it would have hit one of the four engines for their heat signature.

Done, end of story.

[WhoisAlanGreenspan?]

It’s probably good we have some lubricators of the left foul polls here. The circus needs people like you, who officiate the questioning of the official narrative, all of us are just blown away by how smart you are by your $10.00 subscription to cnn news. I wish I knew what was happening, but I can’t afford to pay for it like you can.

[DiogenesLamp]

Both Boeing and the NTSB agreed it was the worn center fuel tank that leaked fuel and was ignited far back and ran up to the plane and exploded the tank.

They will say whatever the government *ORDERS* them to say.

I believe i've argued with you about this before some years back, and I took apart your bullsh*t center fuel tank crap back then.

You were then arguing that it was the wiring in the tank that triggered an ignition, and you posted some data about experiments showing you could get jet fuel to ignite under the right temperatures and pressures in the fuel tank.

I looked at these reports, and the temperatures they cited at which you could ignite the fuel were simply impossible to achieve by any of the wiring that fed the center fuel tank.

I see now you are saying it was "leaking", so that's different.

Nobody is buying your efforts to cover this up. One can only guess you are part of the coverup.