Posted on 07/23/2023 8:33:04 AM PDT by Orlando
I made a couple videos covering space, which is my passion for over 30 years. In these videos you will see unknowns, check out the one from yesterday, because it confirms and cooperates what we see in the international space station live feed.
Also being censored and shadow band really hard, view counts are dropping right before my eyes. I'm just a small's channel. I make no money. I do it because it's my calling & passion, etc.. . I won't be surprised this video receives the same treatments as the others from sound of freedom.
Already just check my videos listing, compare it with current video you will see the view counts continue to drop.
I don't care or give a damn if they banned me in a race all data. Heads up, please give me a thumbs up to see if he shows, and subscribe if you can it helps to thank you
Is there a mighty host in the sun?
Can’t get it to open. Link shows it is “Private”.
“There’s no point in acting surprised about it. All the planning charts and demolition orders have been on display at your local planning department in Alpha Centauri for 50 of your Earth years, so you’ve had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint and it’s far too late to start making a fuss about it now. … What do you mean you’ve never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heaven’s sake, mankind, it’s only four light years away, you know. I’m sorry, but if you can’t be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, that’s your own lookout. Energize the demolition beams.”
Here is your answer—most folks do not want to hear about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t564HRXeS6o
Best post of this….mmmmmm….weird….thread.
They are not covering up the stars. There is a range of light intensities that can be captured by a camera. It is called “exposure latitude”. If you adjust the exposure to render brightly illuminated objects an still show detail, objects with low intensity will not be visible. Conversely, if you adjust exposure to render faintly illuminated objects, bright objects will be shown as all white with no detail.
Read your post again—you just explained how someone could hide the background stars if there was something they did not want folks to see.
Alpha Centauri is a system of 3 stars.
If you could be more specific as to which one of the stars has the plans, perhaps someone could undertake a trip to it and read the plans. But, since one can’t land on any star, there must be an Earth-like planet within that start system, and perhaps then people can take traveling to it more seriously.
Do you want me to start reading some poetry?
As one photographer to another, this is the most likely and physically provable (falsifiable) explanation. As the poster says he is a space junkie, you’d think the most basics of physics would be something he would also be interested in.
Ah, Vogon poetry. The best.
Find your towel first.
So, it boils down to what the subject happens to be and the range of illumination.
I have found that most people revel in their ignorance, preventing solid explanations from upsetting their preconceived notions. Apollo deniers are the most obtuse people I have ever encountered, with the current type a close second.
Yup absolutely verified truth! Those pesky Antartic Nazis—whiter than white! Living in those underground bases...
It is pretty easy to spot someone who actually knows how to work a camera, isn’t it?
Actually, I just explained how someone would show detail on the earth if the stars were not the point of interest. The NASA projects, at least the ones available to the public, are not related to either star or UFO gazing. Please refer to the Hubble project for star gazing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.