Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

There are many ways to detect the fraud in the article. But if judges won’t accept the evidence there are still no consequences.


2 posted on 05/25/2023 4:45:58 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

When they won’t look at video from their own states cameras on drop boxes then it’s a problem. 2000 mules showed how easy it was to get thousands of ballots. They can just repeat 2020 and say the videos debunked or hide the states videos for a year. The judges say no standing.


3 posted on 05/25/2023 4:54:44 AM PDT by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“There are many ways to detect the fraud in the article. But if judges won’t accept the evidence there are still no consequences.”

You missed the point. Had the Trump/Lake Arizona election integrity team accepted the free offer of real-time analysis by the Fractal team, the 17,000 stolen votes would never have occurred, Lake would never have had to go to court and be turned down by a rogue leftist judge over the stolen votes, and we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

“After doing the expert witness report for the Lake Campaign, we saw that had real-time analysis been in place, for even a single county, Lake could have stopped the thousands of voter roll manipulations made days before the election. Lake would have surprised the leftists. The 17,000-vote difference was well within her reach — just not her grasp.”


28 posted on 05/25/2023 5:47:34 AM PDT by Danie_2023
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson