Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/23/2023 Vol.453, Q Day 1972 , RitaOK wrote:
Again I say that every time Armstrong opens his mouth, I hear myself and I’m neither a genius, nor a burning bulb on a common computer.
That which is finally before our eyes must steam his green-eyed floundering critics rooting around in the CIA versions of MA’s work. It’s been a kick seeing who Armstrong’s enemies are.
At least he was heard in 2021, at Mar-A-Lago, for a very good reason.
Thanks.

That's because both you and MA are anti-Q, anti Trump's agenda, tell Americans over and over 'we're' failures and it's too late to change anything.
He uses AI so no one has to think or analyze - just sit at his feet and listen.
You said in a previous post you liked his content about how the events just mysteriously unfolded and people assumed it was a plan. Here's how that works. To factor in Q, Satanists, Illuminati, Rothschilds etc., Armstrong would have had to tell his AI billions and billions of lines of code about each topic so the AI would have something to identify and recognize in it's so called 'predictions'. Armstrong never uploaded that info, his AI is completely blind to the topics and believed the 'plan' just unfolded naturally.
You want to break the Q thread, demoralize the FReeQs etc. and Armstrong's the tool, well one of them, you are using. Repetition for the sake of indoctrination is another tool - you just keep saying we're failures and it's 'too late' etc.

With the same vigor of the anti-Q elements, you elect to engage the same nasty tactics against a clear-eyed civilian who uses his own computer to predict future events based on past events.

Anyone who agrees with Q and/or/or with Armstrong political opinions must be smeared up, cast out and isolated as a dark-side conspirator and Q Thread TREASON.

Good luck with that.

Q never required use of a hammer against anyone. Q used the Socratic approach.

Armstrong uses a computer named “Socrates”.

You flog rigidity against any examples of brain activity, post Q that you can not direct.. (I know, because I’m rigid personally.) Several of us are, but I’m only commenting for myself. I am not RETAILING “Socrates” to anyone.

We’re used to independent thought here and to interpretation of political evolutions coming to light in discussion, on FR. My emphasis is on “FREE”. Give and take..

Q readers are not, in the absence of further Q drops, auto-transformed into your own personal religious cult.

Displaying your inner bully, at trying to herd speech and thought is a dead end. Im surprised you engage in it. Most unbecoming.

I do admit to saying I’ve seen no ground swell of opposition by Americans against our fall into obvious Marxist communism gains occurring inside the USA. Yes. I was shocked by it and said so.

You would do better to hope we eventually Do rise, united in resistance, instead of selling narrow minded versions of patriotism that excuses no public or physical presence ever, for doing anything, much of anywhere, beyond maybe voting.

As for “Breaking the Q Thread”... that would seem to be no one’s fault, but for the abrupt absence of Q, departing with the Q+ Commander In Chief.

Left on our own, it was natural that we would begin to link news sources of interest that are found on the internet, just like the Forum Page.

It’s all for the good, but it is basically a current events thread, with high hope that Q proves the Law of War, Soon.

PS: I would not have responded to you at all, but for your amping up your divining and asinine lies that I am anti-Trump and anti-Q.