[Mom MD]

neither is the author

[woodbutcher1963]

Wow, you are a very fast reader MOM

[Mr. K]

I am curious why federal authorities are anywhere near this?

Are you a big VAX supporter?

[9YearLurker]

And medical professionals have acquitted themselves so well over the past 3 years!

[mewzilla]

If there is a flaw in his logic, I can find it.

So what is it?

[frithguild]

This is a pretty typical litigation type expert opinion that sheds doubt that a result is proximately caused by a condition that may be disputed. The biomechanics make sense, but the proponent here is not a bioengineer.

Part of this is a "net opinion" that I don't think a Court would all a jury to see because it is not adequately supported by facts:

Hamlin arrested twice as an indicator that his cardiac arrests were attributable to an ongoing condition such as myocarditis, pericarditis or another similar heart condition that are evidenced to result from COVID-19 vaccination and boosting.

This is rank speculation. The second arrest may be due to conditions that typically follow an arrest followed by restoration of heartbeat and CPR, whether vby an anoxic injury or damage from the CPR itself.

what I am interested in knowing is whether the treatment now includes thrombolysis for a clotting condition. I doubt we will ever know.

Additionally, I doubt we will ever know whether there was pulmonary oxidative stress (Ang-(1–7) disregulation) a much smaller scale and which was a precipitating factor in the arrest. I would like to know if d-dimers were elevated in the first blood sample (Not sure how quickly surum d-dimer would elevate with this type of trauma.