Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
This certainly is a vaccine.

No. It's not. The CDC's own emails show how they changed their definition because they knew the Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine. THEY said it.

Over 12 billion doses have been administered which is far more than any previous long term testing.

Just wow. So now quantities equal time? There is NO long-term testing on the Jim Jones Jab.

When it comes to validity of the testing, Pfizer openly admitted to injecting their control group, ensuring that there was no control group anymore.

As for the other doses given, there's no testing for those either. They were dispensed in parking lots, sidewalks, subway platforms, etc. by untrained individuals with no data collected on health conditions or any other medications the recipients were also taking. In NO legitimate testing scenario are the medications and preexisting health conditions of recipients ignored.

32 posted on 10/14/2022 12:53:42 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “No. It’s not. The CDC’s own emails show how they changed their definition because they knew the Jim Jones Jab is not a vaccine. THEY said it.”

They said the definition was modified because, just like all other vaccines, this vaccine is not 100% effective.

“When it comes to validity of the testing, Pfizer openly admitted to injecting their control group, ensuring that there was no control group anymore.”

The vaccine is offered to a control group when it becomes clear that it is unethical to withhold the vaccine from that group.


48 posted on 10/15/2022 4:52:23 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson