fbi should have vetted their informant and information...lol they haven’t learned from their prior mistakes...TDS got them again...
Do you think Trump wore a Sherlock Holmes hat and carried a magnifying glass when he did all of this sleuthing?
I think it’s a possibility.
The other possibility is they unwittingly punked themselves.
They are so drunk on their own power they can’t see straight. Just about everyone knows the game. They do whatever the hell they want and the media covers for them.
Based on past performances I say not.
In general, the Deep State types usually DO have dog feces all over themselves, so how can you tell rhe difference now?
Hmmmm. Rumors “they” are showing some grand jury someplace (d.c.?)”evidence”. Anyone? Bueller? 🐂💩
I doubt it.
Who would want to put up with another bunch of BS like this?
He really did not need to do anything like this for his re-election.
I will pass on this conspiracy..no thank you to this.
😂
Well, he does like to toy with weak minded idiots, and it certainly has awakened the public (and jump started the contributions)!
I know that Garland, in his press conference, seemed more ticked off that Trump let the public know about the raid,thus turning the spotlight onto the DOJ & FBI than anything else. He was really not happy that Trump made the raid public.
Was it John Barron..?
Good post—makes sense.
Did anyone other than me sense the utter futility of some inherently unlikable little man tell using we should respect the men and women of the FBI? After the FBI’s performance the past 30 years?
There’s one aspect to what RetiredTexasVet posted, that show his post to be true.
They’re going to have to show how they got the information. And that can only come from a person, unless they tapped into any CCTV, which they would need a warrant for and again, have to show PC for.
So, whoever came them the info better be able to show how they got the information they provided to the FBI. If whatever they were after was in the SCIF or the safe, then it’s more than likely going to have to be someone on the very inside and with a clearance. Of course, they could have left something out and the cleaning lady saw something, but that would mean she has been compromised and working for them the whole time.
What I’d like to know is the sequence of actions on the objective, as they say in the military. They had someone in there to crack the safe, right?
What the first thing they did? Did they go straight to the SCIF and get the safe open after being told that was where the ‘goods’ were being kept? If so, after seeing that it was empty did they start going through every thing out of frustration?
With search warrants, at least under the rules that I used to have to abide by, you can only look in places that could hide/store the evidence you were seeking. IE...if you’re looking for a stolen car, the warrant didn’t give you the authority to look under someone’s bed or go through their panty drawer. You can only look in the driveway, garage, backyard or an outbuilding big enough to hide the car.
They punked themselves. I mean seriously, Garland's presser was a nothing burger garnished with nothing. And Wray only gets a footnote in the archives for his historic "Wray's Panty Raid".
Possibly he punked them. I also have a hard time believing any documents he felt he needed he didn’t back up.
Supposedly they are saying the one who told them was a secret service member
Panty Wrayd.....
Does anyone really believe that DJT would keep sensitive, confidential documents, or information anywhere near him or his private home? He has had plenty of experience with the swamp. He didn’t just fall off a turnip truck.
There was no mole.
Nobody in Trumps Mara Lago inner circle not even the ficus cleaning maid knew what or where the “classified information” was because there was none.
No maid. No classified documents.
No equal justice. No due process.
Garland read the script to the MSM vs. them having to go to journolist.com and pull it down