Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Uh huh. He wanted is his way.


2 posted on 03/18/2022 11:51:26 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

4 posted on 03/18/2022 11:52:31 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: skeeter

Why close them ? Just continue operating them and if push comes to shove just change the name to Burger Queen and continue to serve the same stuff which most likely is produced locally anyway and forget about the “Guidance” via US which collects the royalties for using the name.


71 posted on 03/18/2022 1:34:26 PM PDT by saintgermaine (Saintgermain the time traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Those franchise owners did nothing wrong and Burger King's virtue whining doesn't allow Burger King to change the contract.

If a korporation could change the contract on a woke, virtue whining whim, they'd do it all the time.

Just because the bastardized courts allow it in marriage contracts doesn't mean korporations can do it as well.

78 posted on 03/18/2022 2:14:00 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson