“FINALLY. Trump listed some specific election allegations, instead of just sweeping generalities.”
???? He listed several more a month ago too. I am sure there are more of his quotes of how the election was statistically impossible. I know of several others anomalies, but this is a reply to you about what he said earlier.
Does anybody really think that Biden beat Obama with the Black population in select Swing State cities, but nowhere else? That he would lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and 27 out of 27 “toss-up” House races, but somehow miraculously receive the most votes in American history with no coattails? That he would lose Florida, Ohio, and Iowa and win, even though it has never been done before?
Not really, but in a court of law, that is simply an anomaly, rather than any actual evidence of wrongdoing. Sure, there's the court of public opinion where something like that can count, but often public opinion is dependent direct evidence as well.
Trump's detractors like Pence have already proven they don't care about the public opinions of Trump's current fanbase, else Pence wouldn't have made the bold statements he made knowing they were sure to provoke Trump's base. Therefore they apparently feel confident in fighting the fight even conceding that Trump's diehard supporters are convinced the election was stolen, but maybe no one else.
Maybe they're wrong, but Trump needs direct evidence that is compelling to more than just his current base, to start tilting the arguments more decidedly in his direction. Arguments that may also need to be legally sound, depending on where this is ultimately heading.
Maybe Trump already knows all this, but is just dripping it out due to a preconceived strategy. But as you probably know, I've been calling on this next step from him for some time, and low and behold he's finally doing it, either because he planned to all along, or is just now realizing it's the next right more.
My guess is going forward he'll either need to focus more on these specific instances of potential fraud, and mine the specific details much more than he has so far, or run the risk of these instances just being seen as not strong enough to actually bear any weight. The best way to show they're reliably strong will be to host them on one of his own sites, which would then demonstrate his full commitment to their legitimacy. My guess is further that's what he'll eventually do, out of need if nothing else, just not sure why all this wasn't already all done by now. Thanks.