FINALLY. Trump listed some specific election allegations, instead of just sweeping generalities.
Next, he should aggregate those somewhere online, in greater detail, for reference. Make the case specifically and undeniably, or don’t make the case at all.
Had he already done that, Pence wouldn’t have had the same latitude to make the statements he did last week, that “the American people had spoken” or whatever other similar BS it was.
If Trump will start building an archive of specific discrepancies, he can start challenging people like Pence to respond to those specific instances of fraud. Otherwise, his critics can in some respects rightfully ignore his generalities as being too grandiose or fanciful.
Just build the website full of evidence and reference it whenever the subject comes up. Of course not everyone will believe it, but more will than those who say just take Trump’s word for it.
Then get back to what’s MOST important right now - making sire they don’t steal 2022.
“FINALLY. Trump listed some specific election allegations, instead of just sweeping generalities.”
???? He listed several more a month ago too. I am sure there are more of his quotes of how the election was statistically impossible. I know of several others anomalies, but this is a reply to you about what he said earlier.
Does anybody really think that Biden beat Obama with the Black population in select Swing State cities, but nowhere else? That he would lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and 27 out of 27 “toss-up” House races, but somehow miraculously receive the most votes in American history with no coattails? That he would lose Florida, Ohio, and Iowa and win, even though it has never been done before?
Here are some of my stats from an earlier post...
The hate turnout is one of the BIG LIES the media and establishment pushes to not look at the results. People were not enthusiastic about a basement-ridden demented old fool that could not draw a crowd of 50 people. He offended black people throughout the campaign, yet he beat Obama in every battleground minority community in the nation. Did you know that Biden won 10% less counties than Obama, yet beat him by double-digit percentages in everyone he won.
Blacks did not think Biden was their great savior, Obama had that mantle. In fact, in non-battleground states, Trump picked up the Black Vote percentages over his last campaign because of his prison reform. It was only in these democrat cities where precincts reported 95%-100% votes for Biden with participation rates near 100%. With some precincts exceeding 100% participation. Yeah, that happens.
More unbelievable vote totals. Now these 500,000 vote gains in each battleground are democrats only. Trump picked up so many votes the Democrats had to add the 500,000 mail-in votes to barely beat him. The idea that a 1,000,000 voter gain in each battleground state from one presidential election to the next is laughable.
Does anybody really think that Biden beat Obama with the Black population in select Swing State cities, but nowhere else? That he would lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and 27 out of 27 “toss-up” House races, but somehow miraculously receive the most votes in American history with no coattails? That he would lose Florida, Ohio, and Iowa and win, even though it has never been done before?
GA
1,773,827 Obama
1,837,300 Clinton GA
2,473,633 Biden (+35%)
Penn
2,990,274 Obama
2,926,441 Clinton
3,459,923 Biden (+19%)
MI
2,564,569 Obama
2,268,839 Clinton
2,804,040 Biden (+24%)
WI
1,620,985 Obama
1,382,536 Clinton
1,630,866 Biden (+18%)
AZ
1,025,232 Obama
1,161,167 Clinton
1,672,143 Biden (+44%)
NV
531,373 Obama
539,260 Clinton
703,486 Biden (+30)
Trump did this well after an organized coup attempt (which the Repubs let happen), two impeachments, full-force of every agency under the DOJ’s control, the most hostile press in history, and not support from the GOP.
Are you Rumpelstiltskin just using Golden Eagle for a cover name?
The Navarro Report
https://peternavarro.com/the-navarro-report/
The three volumes of the Navarro Report provide a demonstration that President Trump had a good faith belief that the November 3, 2020 Presidential election results, were, indeed, the poisonous fruit of widespread fraud and election irregularities. Evidence used in the preparation of the Navarro Report includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.
Pence wouldn’t have had the same latitude to make the statements he did last week, that “the American people had spoken” or whatever other similar BS it was.
Pence did the usual politician / media thing.
Said one thing that factual. He, as an individual couldn’t change it, but He as the VP could have reverted the decision to verify electors back to the state legislatures where there were valid questions.
To people like him, and the media, they count on simple weasel words to fool the people and sound like they are right...